IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i5p977-d146086.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding of Information about Medicines Use among Parents of Pre-School Children in Serbia: Parental Pharmacotherapy Literacy Questionnaire (PTHL-SR)

Author

Listed:
  • Stana Ubavić

    (Medicines and Medical Devices Agency of Serbia (ALIMS), 11221 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Nataša Bogavac-Stanojević

    (Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, 11221 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Aleksandra Jović-Vraneš

    (Institute of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Dušanka Krajnović

    (Department of Social Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Legislation, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, 11221 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

Parental health literacy plays an important role in children’s health. Experiences from pharmacy practice show that is necessary to check if parents understand instructions about use of medicines for children. This study aimed to assess pharmacotherapy literacy of parents of pre-school children and to examine association of parental pharmacotherapy literacy level with parent’s socio-demographic characteristics. The study was cross-sectional, conducted among parents of pre-school children (1–7 years of age), in kindergartens in several municipalities of Belgrade, Serbia, during regular parents meetings, from May to October 2016. Functional health literacy was measured by the Serbian version of the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA). Parental pharmacotherapy literacy was assessed with newly constructed PTHL-SR questionnaire with good psychometric characteristics (Parental pharmacotherapy literacy questionnaire—Serbian). Overall, 813 parents participated in the study, mostly females (81.30%), between 30 to 40 years of age (70.85%) with two children (56.70%). Almost all of our study participants (99%) had adequate health literacy as assessed by S-TOFHLA. Mean score on PTHL-SR was 72.83% (standard deviation was 13.37), with better results among females than males (72% of women were in the group of highest PTHL-SR results). Our study showed that many parents (76.5%) knew the appropriate usage of non-prescription medicine for children, 57.2% parents were able to correctly calculate the dose of oral syrup for a child, and only 43.3% were able to interpret non-prescription dosage information written on the package. The majority of parents (61.3%) would make a dosage to child based on age and not on their weight. Every fifth parent with adequate functional health literacy measured by S-TOFHLA test, achieved the lowest results measured by PTHL-SR. Higher performance of the PTHL-SR was significantly correlated with education ( p < 0.001), female sex ( p < 0.001), married parents and those living in common-law ( p < 0.001), older parents ( p < 0.05) and parents who have more children ( p < 0.05), and are non-smokers ( p < 0.05). These results provide evidence that limitations in understanding common information about use of medicines are widespread among parents of pre-school children and encourage efforts for further investigation. PTHL-SR questionnaire may be a useful tool for identification of parents who need more instructions and assistance from healthcare providers, above all in providing better communication, written or spoken at community pharmacy settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Stana Ubavić & Nataša Bogavac-Stanojević & Aleksandra Jović-Vraneš & Dušanka Krajnović, 2018. "Understanding of Information about Medicines Use among Parents of Pre-School Children in Serbia: Parental Pharmacotherapy Literacy Questionnaire (PTHL-SR)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:5:p:977-:d:146086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/5/977/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/5/977/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aleksandra Jovic-Vranes & Vesna Bjegovic-Mikanovic & Jelena Marinkovic & Nikola Kocev, 2011. "Health literacy in a population of primary health-care patients in Belgrade, Serbia," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 56(2), pages 201-207, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marija Levic & Natasa Bogavac-Stanojevic & Dragana Lakic & Dusanka Krajnovic, 2023. "Predictors of Inadequate Health Literacy among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Assessment with Different Self-Reported Instruments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janka Poráčová & Ivan Uher & Hedviga Vašková & Tatiana Kimáková & Mária Konečná & Marta Mydlárová Blaščáková & Vincent Sedlák, 2022. "Effectiveness of Adherence to a Mediterranean Diet in the Management of Overweight Women: The Prospective Interventional Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Nevena Todorovic & Aleksandra Jovic-Vranes & Bosiljka Djikanovic & Natasa Pilipovic-Broceta & Nadja Vasiljevic & Maja Racic, 2019. "Health Literacy: Current Status and Challenges in the Work of Family Doctors in Bosnia and Herzegovina," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Marija Jovanić & Marija Zdravković & Dejana Stanisavljević & Aleksandra Jović Vraneš, 2018. "Exploring the Importance of Health Literacy for the Quality of Life in Patients with Heart Failure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Nida Buawangpong & Wachiranun Sirikul & Chanya Anukhro & Mathuramat Seesen & Aroon La-up & Penprapa Siviroj, 2022. "Health Information Sources Influencing Health Literacy in Different Social Contexts across Age Groups in Northern Thailand Citizens," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:5:p:977-:d:146086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.