IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i5p853-d143168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Observance of Sterilization Protocol Guideline Procedures of Critical Instruments for Preventing Iatrogenic Transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease in Dental Practice in France, 2017

Author

Listed:
  • Denis Bourgeois

    (Laboratory “Systemic Health Care”, EA4129, University Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France)

  • Claude Dussart

    (Laboratory “Systemic Health Care”, EA4129, University Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France)

  • Ina Saliasi

    (Laboratory “Systemic Health Care”, EA4129, University Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France)

  • Laurent Laforest

    (Department of Public Health, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France)

  • Paul Tramini

    (Department of Public Health, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France)

  • Florence Carrouel

    (Laboratory “Systemic Health Care”, EA4129, University Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France)

Abstract

Effective sterilization of reusable instruments contaminated by Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease in dental care is a crucial issue for public health. The present cross-sectional study investigated how the recommended procedures for sterilization were implemented by French dental practices in real-world settings. A sample of dental practices was selected in the French Rhône-Alpes region. Data were collected by a self-questionnaire in 2016. Sterilization procedures ( n = 33) were classified into 4 groups: (1) Pre-sterilization cleaning of reusable instruments; (2) Biological verification of sterilization cycles—Monitoring steam sterilization procedures; (3) Autoclave performance and practitioner knowledge of autoclave use; (4) Monitoring and documentation of sterilization procedures—Tracking and tracing the instrumentation. Answers were provided per procedure, along with the global implementation of procedures within a group (over 80% correctly performed). Then it was verified how adherence to procedure groups varied with the size of the dental practice and the proportion of dental assistants within the team. Among the 179 questionnaires available for the analyses, adherence to the recommended procedures of sterilization noticeably varied between practices, from 20.7% to 82.6%. The median percentages of procedures correctly implemented per practice were 58.1%, 50.9%, 69.2% and 58.2%, in Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively (corresponding percentages for performing over 80% of the procedures in the group: 23.4%, 6.6%, 46.6% and 38.6%). Dental practices ≥ 3 dental units performed significantly better (>80%) procedures of Groups 2 and 4 ( p = 0.01 and p = 0.002, respectively), while no other significant associations emerged. As a rule, practices complied poorly with the recommended procedures, despite partially improved results in bigger practices. Specific training regarding sterilization procedures and a better understanding of the reasons leading to their non-compliance are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Denis Bourgeois & Claude Dussart & Ina Saliasi & Laurent Laforest & Paul Tramini & Florence Carrouel, 2018. "Observance of Sterilization Protocol Guideline Procedures of Critical Instruments for Preventing Iatrogenic Transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease in Dental Practice in France, 2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:5:p:853-:d:143168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/5/853/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/5/853/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:5:p:853-:d:143168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.