IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i4p756-d141121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parental Opinions and Attitudes about Children’s Vaccination Safety in Silesian Voivodeship, Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Bogumiła Braczkowska

    (Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Kowalska

    (Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland)

  • Kamil Barański

    (Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland)

  • Maksymilian Gajda

    (Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland)

  • Tomasz Kurowski

    (Student Scientific Society Unit at the Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland)

  • Jan E. Zejda

    (Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

Despite mandatory vaccinations in Poland, the final decision on vaccination in children is taken by their parents or legal guardians. Understanding parents’ attitudes and opinions regarding vaccinations is essential for planning and undertaking extensive and properly targeted educational actions aimed at preventing their hesitancy. In 2016, a cross-sectional study was conducted in the Silesian Voivodeship (Poland) in 11 randomly selected educational institutions. The authors’ self-administered questionnaire contained 24 mixed-type questions. It was distributed among 3000 parents or legal guardians of children aged 6–13 years; prior consent of the relevant bioethics committee had been obtained. The response rate was 41.3% ( N = 1239). Data were analysed using descriptive and analytical statistics, and focused on parental opinions regarding the safety of vaccines. Results of simple and multivariable analyses showed that perceived risk of adverse vaccine reaction (AVR), contraindications and perception of the qualification procedure for vaccination as substandard were significant factors associated with the rating of children’s vaccination as unsafe ( p < 0.001). Respondents with a lower level of education, compared with those with higher, more often declared vaccinations to be safe ( p = 0.03); however, results of multivariable analysis did not confirm that effect. AVR occurrence, finding of contraindication to vaccinations and perception of qualification procedure for vaccination were found to be the most important factors responsible for influencing general public opinions in the field of vaccination safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Bogumiła Braczkowska & Małgorzata Kowalska & Kamil Barański & Maksymilian Gajda & Tomasz Kurowski & Jan E. Zejda, 2018. "Parental Opinions and Attitudes about Children’s Vaccination Safety in Silesian Voivodeship, Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-8, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:756-:d:141121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/756/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/756/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kamil Barański & Maksymilian Gajda & Bogumiła Braczkowska & Małgorzata Kowalska, 2019. "Parental Declaration of Adverse Event Following Immunization in a Cross-Sectional Study in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-9, October.
    2. Boban Melovic & Andjela Jaksic Stojanovic & Tamara Backovic Vulic & Branislav Dudic & Eleonora Benova, 2020. "The Impact of Online Media on Parents’ Attitudes toward Vaccination of Children—Social Marketing and Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-27, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:756-:d:141121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.