IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i3p549-d136981.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality of Patient-Centered Care Provided to Patients Attending Hematological Cancer Treatment Centers

Author

Listed:
  • Flora Tzelepis

    (Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
    Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia)

  • Tara Clinton-McHarg

    (Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
    Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia)

  • Christine L Paul

    (Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
    Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia)

  • Robert W Sanson-Fisher

    (Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
    Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia)

  • Douglas Joshua

    (Institute of Haematology, New South Wales Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)

  • Mariko L Carey

    (Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
    Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia)

Abstract

The Institute of Medicine has recommended that improvements are needed in patient-centered care. This study examined hematological cancer patients’ perceptions of which aspects of cancer care were being delivered well and areas that required improvement, and whether patient characteristics, or the treatment center they attended, were associated with quality of patient-centered care. Participants were recruited via three Australian hematological cancer treatment centers and completed a paper-and-pen survey assessing sociodemographic, disease, and psychological and treatment characteristics at recruitment. A second survey that contained the Quality of Patient-Centered Cancer Care measure was completed one month after recruitment ( n = 215). The most frequently delivered feature of patient-centered cancer care was hospital staff showing respect for patients (91.0%). The area of care reported most commonly as not being delivered was hospital staff helping the patient find other cancer patients to talk to (29.8%). Patients without depression reported higher perceived quality of treatment decision-making, co-ordinated and integrated care, emotional support, follow-up care, respectful communication, and cancer information than patients with depression. The treatment center that was attended was associated only with the quality of cancer information patients received. Privacy issues may hinder staff connecting patients directly but this could be overcome via referrals to cancer organizations that offer peer support services.

Suggested Citation

  • Flora Tzelepis & Tara Clinton-McHarg & Christine L Paul & Robert W Sanson-Fisher & Douglas Joshua & Mariko L Carey, 2018. "Quality of Patient-Centered Care Provided to Patients Attending Hematological Cancer Treatment Centers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:3:p:549-:d:136981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/3/549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/3/549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcus Gumpert & Jens-Peter Reese, 2019. "Quality Management Systems in the Ambulant Sector: An Analytical Comparison of Different Quality Management Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:3:p:549-:d:136981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.