IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i3p519-d136315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Effects on Sleep

Author

Listed:
  • Mathias Basner

    (Division of Sleep and Chronobiology, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

  • Sarah McGuire

    (Division of Sleep and Chronobiology, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

Abstract

To evaluate the quality of available evidence on the effects of environmental noise exposure on sleep a systematic review was conducted. The databases PSYCINFO, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science and the TNO Repository were searched for non-laboratory studies on the effects of environmental noise on sleep with measured or predicted noise levels and published in or after the year 2000. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria. Seventy four studies predominately conducted between 2000 and 2015 were included in the review. A meta-analysis of surveys linking road, rail, and aircraft noise exposure to self-reports of sleep disturbance was conducted. The odds ratio for the percent highly sleep disturbed for a 10 dB increase in L night was significant for aircraft (1.94; 95% CI 1.61–2.3), road (2.13; 95% CI 1.82–2.48), and rail (3.06; 95% CI 2.38–3.93) noise when the question referred to noise, but non-significant for aircraft (1.17; 95% CI 0.54–2.53), road (1.09; 95% CI 0.94–1.27), and rail (1.27; 95% CI 0.89–1.81) noise when the question did not refer to noise. A pooled analysis of polysomnographic studies on the acute effects of transportation noise on sleep was also conducted and the unadjusted odds ratio for the probability of awakening for a 10 dBA increase in the indoor L max was significant for aircraft (1.35; 95% CI 1.22–1.50), road (1.36; 95% CI 1.19–1.55), and rail (1.35; 95% CI 1.21–1.52) noise. Due to a limited number of studies and the use of different outcome measures, a narrative review only was conducted for motility, cardiac and blood pressure outcomes, and for children’s sleep. The effect of wind turbine and hospital noise on sleep was also assessed. Based on the available evidence, transportation noise affects objectively measured sleep physiology and subjectively assessed sleep disturbance in adults. For other outcome measures and noise sources the examined evidence was conflicting or only emerging. According to GRADE criteria, the quality of the evidence was moderate for cortical awakenings and self-reported sleep disturbance (for questions that referred to noise) induced by traffic noise, low for motility measures of traffic noise induced sleep disturbance, and very low for all other noise sources and investigated sleep outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathias Basner & Sarah McGuire, 2018. "WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Effects on Sleep," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-45, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:3:p:519-:d:136315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/3/519/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/3/519/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theo Bodin & Jonas Björk & Jonas Ardö & Maria Albin, 2015. "Annoyance, Sleep and Concentration Problems due to Combined Traffic Noise and the Benefit of Quiet Side," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amber L. Pearson & Victoria Breeze & Aaron Reuben & Gwen Wyatt, 2021. "Increased Use of Porch or Backyard Nature during COVID-19 Associated with Lower Stress and Better Symptom Experience among Breast Cancer Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Angel M. Dzhambov & Iana Markevych & Boris Tilov & Zlatoslav Arabadzhiev & Drozdstoj Stoyanov & Penka Gatseva & Donka D. Dimitrova, 2018. "Lower Noise Annoyance Associated with GIS-Derived Greenspace: Pathways through Perceived Greenspace and Residential Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Jorge H. Amorim & Magnuz Engardt & Christer Johansson & Isabel Ribeiro & Magnus Sannebro, 2021. "Regulating and Cultural Ecosystem Services of Urban Green Infrastructure in the Nordic Countries: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Stéphane Perron & Céline Plante & Martina S. Ragettli & David J. Kaiser & Sophie Goudreau & Audrey Smargiassi, 2016. "Sleep Disturbance from Road Traffic, Railways, Airplanes and from Total Environmental Noise Levels in Montreal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Irene van Kamp & Sendrick Simon & Hilary Notley & Christos Baliatsas & Elise van Kempen, 2020. "Evidence Relating to Environmental Noise Exposure and Annoyance, Sleep Disturbance, Cardio-Vascular and Metabolic Health Outcomes in the Context of IGCB (N): A Scoping Review of New Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Zhi Yue & Ying Zhong & Zhouxiao Cui, 2022. "Respondent Dynamic Attention to Streetscape Composition in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Peter Lercher & Bert De Coensel & Luc Dekonink & Dick Botteldooren, 2017. "Community Response to Multiple Sound Sources: Integrating Acoustic and Contextual Approaches in the Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-34, June.
    8. Xue Zhang & Suhong Zhou, 2023. "Building a City with Low Noise Pollution: Exploring the Mental Health Effect Thresholds of Spatiotemporal Environmental Noise Exposure and Urban Planning Solution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Mark Brink & Beat Schäffer & Danielle Vienneau & Reto Pieren & Maria Foraster & Ikenna C. Eze & Franziska Rudzik & Laurie Thiesse & Christian Cajochen & Nicole Probst-Hensch & Martin Röösli & Jean Mar, 2019. "Self-Reported Sleep Disturbance from Road, Rail and Aircraft Noise: Exposure-Response Relationships and Effect Modifiers in the SiRENE Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Xiaoqi Feng & Claudia Flexeder & Iana Markevych & Marie Standl & Joachim Heinrich & Tamara Schikowski & Sibylle Koletzko & Gunda Herberth & Carl-Peter Bauer & Andrea von Berg & Dietrich Berdel & Thoma, 2020. "Impact of Residential Green Space on Sleep Quality and Sufficiency in Children and Adolescents Residing in Australia and Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:3:p:519-:d:136315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.