IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i2p277-d130468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of Pancreatic Injury in Patients with Elevated Amylase or Lipase Level Using a Decision Tree Classifier: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Analysis in a Level I Trauma Center

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng-Shyuan Rau

    (Department of Neurosurgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Shao-Chun Wu

    (Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Peng-Chen Chien

    (Department of Plastic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan)

  • Pao-Jen Kuo

    (Department of Plastic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan)

  • Yi-Chun Chen

    (Department of Plastic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan)

  • Hsiao-Yun Hsieh

    (Department of Plastic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan)

  • Ching-Hua Hsieh

    (Department of Plastic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan)

  • Hang-Tsung Liu

    (Department of Trauma Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan)

Abstract

Background: In trauma patients, pancreatic injury is rare; however, if undiagnosed, it is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Few predictive models are available for the identification of pancreatic injury in trauma patients with elevated serum pancreatic enzymes. In this study, we aimed to construct a model for predicting pancreatic injury using a decision tree (DT) algorithm, along with data obtained from a population-based trauma registry in a Level I trauma center. Methods: A total of 991 patients with elevated serum levels of amylase (>137 U/L) or lipase (>51 U/L), including 46 patients with pancreatic injury and 865 without pancreatic injury between January 2009 and December 2016, were allocated in a ratio of 7:3 to training ( n = 642) or test ( n = 269) sets. Using the data on patient and injury characteristics as well as laboratory data, the DT algorithm with Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis was performed based on the Gini impurity index, using the rpart function in the rpart package in R. Results: Among the trauma patients with elevated amylase or lipase levels, three groups of patients were identified as having a high risk of pancreatic injury, using the DT model. These included (1) 69% of the patients with lipase level ≥306 U/L; (2) 79% of the patients with lipase level between 154 U/L and 305 U/L and shock index (SI) ≥ 0.72; and (3) 80% of the patients with lipase level <154 U/L with abdomen injury, glucose level <158 mg/dL, amylase level <90 U/L, and neutrophil percentage ≥76%; they had all sustained pancreatic injury. With all variables in the model, the DT achieved an accuracy of 97.9% (sensitivity of 91.4% and specificity of 98.3%) for the training set. In the test set, the DT achieved an accuracy of 93.3%, sensitivity of 72.7%, and specificity of 94.2%. Conclusions: We established a DT model using lipase, SI, and additional conditions (injury to the abdomen, glucose level <158 mg/dL, amylase level <90 U/L, and neutrophils ≥76%) as important nodes to predict three groups of patients with a high risk of pancreatic injury. The proposed decision-making algorithm may help in identifying pancreatic injury among trauma patients with elevated serum amylase or lipase levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng-Shyuan Rau & Shao-Chun Wu & Peng-Chen Chien & Pao-Jen Kuo & Yi-Chun Chen & Hsiao-Yun Hsieh & Ching-Hua Hsieh & Hang-Tsung Liu, 2018. "Identification of Pancreatic Injury in Patients with Elevated Amylase or Lipase Level Using a Decision Tree Classifier: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Analysis in a Level I Trauma Center," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:2:p:277-:d:130468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/2/277/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/2/277/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheng-Shyuan Rau & Shao-Chun Wu & Spencer C. H. Kuo & Kuo Pao-Jen & Hsu Shiun-Yuan & Yi-Chun Chen & Hsiao-Yun Hsieh & Ching-Hua Hsieh & Hang-Tsung Liu, 2016. "Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Trauma Patients with Shock Index, Modified Shock Index, and Age Shock Index," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-11, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fang-Yu Hsu & Shih-Hsuan Mao & Andy Deng-Chi Chuang & Yon-Cheong Wong & Chih-Hao Chen, 2021. "Shock Index as a Predictor for Angiographic Hemostasis in Life-Threatening Traumatic Oronasal Bleeding," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-12, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    n/a;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:2:p:277-:d:130468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.