IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i2p179-d128205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

System-Wide and Group-Specific Health Service Improvements: Cross-Sectional Survey of Outpatient Improvement Preferences and Associations with Demographic Characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth A. Fradgley

    (Priority Research Centre for Cancer Research, Innovation and Translation, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
    Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)

  • Christine L. Paul

    (Priority Research Centre for Cancer Research, Innovation and Translation, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
    Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)

  • Jamie Bryant

    (Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
    Health Behaviour Research Group, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)

  • Alison Zucca

    (Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
    Health Behaviour Research Group, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)

  • Christopher Oldmeadow

    (Hunter Medical Research Institute, HMRI Building, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
    School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)

Abstract

Efficient patient-centred quality improvement requires an understanding of the system-wide areas of dissatisfaction along with evidence to identify the programs which can be strategically targeted according to specific patient characteristics and preferences. This cross-sectional study reports the proportion of chronic disease outpatients selecting 23 patient-centred improvement initiatives. Using univariate tests and multivariable logistic regressions, this multi-site study also identifies initiatives differentially selected by outpatients according to clinical and demographic characteristics. A total of 475 outpatients participated (49% response). Commonly selected initiatives included: reducing wait-times (22.3%); convenient appointment scheduling (16.0%); and receiving up-to-date treatment information (16.0%). Within univariate tests, preferences for information and service accessibility initiatives were not significantly associated with specific subgroups. However, seven initiatives were preferred according to age, gender, diagnosis status, and chronic disease type within multivariate models. For example, neurology outpatients were more likely to select assistance to manage psychological symptoms when compared to oncology outpatients (OR: 2.89). Study findings suggest that system-wide programs to enhance information provision are strategic approaches to improve experiences across patient characteristics. Furthermore, a few initiatives can be targeted to specific groups and emphasized the importance of detailed scoping analyses and tailored implementation plans when designing patient-centred quality improvement programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth A. Fradgley & Christine L. Paul & Jamie Bryant & Alison Zucca & Christopher Oldmeadow, 2018. "System-Wide and Group-Specific Health Service Improvements: Cross-Sectional Survey of Outpatient Improvement Preferences and Associations with Demographic Characteristics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:2:p:179-:d:128205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/2/179/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/2/179/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:2:p:179-:d:128205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.