IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i1p153-d127669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High Proportions of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter spp. Isolates in a District in Western India: A Four-Year Antibiotic Susceptibility Study of Clinical Isolates

Author

Listed:
  • Ingvild Odsbu

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
    Contributed equally.)

  • Smita Khedkar

    (Bac-Test Laboratory, College Road, Nashik 422005, Maharashtra, India
    Contributed equally.)

  • Uday Khedkar

    (Bac-Test Laboratory, College Road, Nashik 422005, Maharashtra, India)

  • Sandeep S. Nerkar

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
    Indian Initiative for Management of Antibiotic Resistance, Department of Environmental Medicine, R.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain 456006, India)

  • Ashok J. Tamhankar

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
    Indian Initiative for Management of Antibiotic Resistance, Department of Environmental Medicine, R.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain 456006, India)

  • Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden)

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the proportions of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter spp. isolates from the district of Nashik in Western India during the period from 2011–2014. Antibacterial susceptibility testing of isolates from inpatients and outpatients was performed using Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method to determine inhibitory zone diameters. Proportions of non-susceptible isolates were calculated from the antibacterial susceptibility data. MDR was defined as an isolate being non-susceptible to at least one antibacterial agent in at least three antibacterial categories. The change in proportions of MDR isolates; extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing isolates; and non-susceptible isolates to specific antibacterial categories over calendar time was investigated by logistic regression. The proportions of MDR and ESBL-producing isolates ranged from 89.4% to 95.9% and from 87.9% to 94.0%; respectively. The proportions of non-susceptible isolates to aminoglycosides; carbapenems; antipseudomonal penicillins/β-lactamase inhibitors; cephalosporins; folate pathway inhibitors; or penicillins/β-lactamase inhibitors exceeded 77.5%. Proportions of fluoroquinolone and tetracycline non-susceptible isolates ranged from 65.3% to 83.3% and from 71.3% to 75.9%; respectively. No changes in trends were observed over time; except for a decreasing trend in fluoroquinolone non-susceptible isolates (OR = 0.75 (95% CI, 0.62–0.91)). Significantly higher proportions of non-susceptible; MDR and ESBL-producing isolates were found among isolates from the respiratory system compared to isolates from all other specimen types ( p < 0.05). High proportions of MDR Acinetobacter spp. isolates were observed in the period from 2011–2014. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes are needed to prevent the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ingvild Odsbu & Smita Khedkar & Uday Khedkar & Sandeep S. Nerkar & Ashok J. Tamhankar & Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg, 2018. "High Proportions of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter spp. Isolates in a District in Western India: A Four-Year Antibiotic Susceptibility Study of Clinical Isolates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:1:p:153-:d:127669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/1/153/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/1/153/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:1:p:153-:d:127669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.