IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i11p2435-d179773.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of Questionnaire Methods to Quantify Recreational Water Ingestion

Author

Listed:
  • Laura M. Suppes

    (Environmental Public Health Program, The University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, 105 Garfield Avenue, Eau Claire, WI 54702, USA)

  • Kacey C. Ernst

    (Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, P.O. Box 245163, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA)

  • Leif Abrell

    (Department of Soil, Water & Environmental Science, The University of Arizona, Gould-Simpson Building Room 611, 1040 East 4th Street, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA)

  • Kelly A. Reynolds

    (Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, P.O. Box 245163, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA)

Abstract

Swimming pool water ingestion volumes are necessary for assessing infection risk from swimming. Pool water ingestion volumes can be estimated by questionnaire or measuring a chemical tracer in swimmer urine. Questionnaires are often preferred to the chemical tracer method because surveys are less time consuming, but no research exists validating questionnaires accurately quantify pool water ingestion volumes. The objective of this study was to explore if questionnaires are a reliable tool for collecting pool water ingestion volumes. A questionnaire was issued at four pool sites in Tucson, Arizona to 46 swimmers who also submitted a urine sample for analyzing cyanuric acid, a chemical tracer. Perceived ingestion volumes reported on the questionnaire were compared with pool water ingestion volumes, quantified by analyzing cyanuric acid in swimmer urine. Swimmers were asked if they swallowed (1) no water or only a few drops, (2) one to two mouthfuls, (3) three to five mouthfuls, or (4) six to eight mouthfuls. One mouthful is the equivalent of 27 mL of water. The majority (81%) of swimmers ingested <27 mL of pool water but reported ingesting >27 mL (“one mouthful”) on the questionnaire. More than half (52%) of swimmers overestimated their ingestion volume. These findings suggest swimmers are over-estimating pool water ingestion because they perceive one mouthful is <27 mL. The questionnaire did not reliably collect pool water ingestion volumes and should be improved for future exposure assessment studies. Images of the ingestion volume categories should be included on the questionnaire to help swimmers visualize the response options.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura M. Suppes & Kacey C. Ernst & Leif Abrell & Kelly A. Reynolds, 2018. "Validation of Questionnaire Methods to Quantify Recreational Water Ingestion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-6, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:11:p:2435-:d:179773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/11/2435/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/11/2435/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:11:p:2435-:d:179773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.