IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i8p947-d109279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surface Sampling Collection and Culture Methods for Escherichia coli in Household Environments with High Fecal Contamination

Author

Listed:
  • Natalie G. Exum

    (Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-2179, USA)

  • Margaret N. Kosek

    (Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205-2179, USA
    Asociación Benéfica Proyectos de Informática, Salud, Medicina, y Agricultura (A.B. PRISMA), Iquitos, Peru)

  • Meghan F. Davis

    (Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-2179, USA)

  • Kellogg J. Schwab

    (Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-2179, USA)

Abstract

Empiric quantification of environmental fecal contamination is an important step toward understanding the impact that water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions have on reducing enteric infections. There is a need to standardize the methods used for surface sampling in field studies that examine fecal contamination in low-income settings. The dry cloth method presented in this manuscript improves upon the more commonly used swabbing technique that has been shown in the literature to have a low sampling efficiency. The recovery efficiency of a dry electrostatic cloth sampling method was evaluated using Escherichia coli and then applied to household surfaces in Iquitos, Peru, where there is high fecal contamination and enteric infection. Side-by-side measurements were taken from various floor locations within a household at the same time over a three-month period to compare for consistency of quantification of E. coli bacteria. The dry cloth sampling method in the laboratory setting showed 105% (95% Confidence Interval: 98%, 113%) E. coli recovery efficiency off of the cloths. The field application demonstrated strong agreement of side-by-side results (Pearson correlation coefficient for dirt surfaces was 0.83 ( p < 0.0001) and 0.91 ( p < 0.0001) for cement surfaces) and moderate agreement for results between entrance and kitchen samples (Pearson (0.53, p < 0.0001) and weighted Kappa statistic (0.54, p < 0.0001)). Our findings suggest that this method can be utilized in households with high bacterial loads using either continuous (quantitative) or categorical (semi-quantitative) data. The standardization of this low-cost, dry electrostatic cloth sampling method can be used to measure differences between households in intervention and non-intervention arms of randomized trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalie G. Exum & Margaret N. Kosek & Meghan F. Davis & Kellogg J. Schwab, 2017. "Surface Sampling Collection and Culture Methods for Escherichia coli in Household Environments with High Fecal Contamination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-9, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:8:p:947-:d:109279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/8/947/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/8/947/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pengcheng Zhao & Pak-To Chan & Nan Zhang & Yuguo Li, 2022. "An Advanced Tape-Stripping Approach for High-Efficiency Sampling on Non-Absorbent Surfaces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:8:p:947-:d:109279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.