IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i7p826-d105619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Worldwide Regulations of Standard Values of Pesticides for Human Health Risk Control: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Zijian Li

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
    Parsons Corporation, Chicago, IL 60606, USA)

  • Aaron Jennings

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA)

Abstract

: The impact of pesticide residues on human health is a worldwide problem, as human exposure to pesticides can occur through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact. Regulatory jurisdictions have promulgated the standard values for pesticides in residential soil, air, drinking water, and agricultural commodity for years. Until now, more than 19,400 pesticide soil regulatory guidance values (RGVs) and 5400 pesticide drinking water maximum concentration levels (MCLs) have been regulated by 54 and 102 nations, respectively. Over 90 nations have provided pesticide agricultural commodity maximum residue limits (MRLs) for at least one of the 12 most commonly consumed agricultural foods. A total of 22 pesticides have been regulated with more than 100 soil RGVs, and 25 pesticides have more than 100 drinking water MCLs. This research indicates that those RGVs and MCLs for an individual pesticide could vary over seven (DDT drinking water MCLs), eight (Lindane soil RGVs), or even nine (Dieldrin soil RGVs) orders of magnitude. Human health risk uncertainty bounds and the implied total exposure mass burden model were applied to analyze the most commonly regulated and used pesticides for human health risk control. For the top 27 commonly regulated pesticides in soil, there are at least 300 RGVs (8% of the total) that are above all of the computed upper bounds for human health risk uncertainty. For the top 29 most-commonly regulated pesticides in drinking water, at least 172 drinking water MCLs (5% of the total) exceed the computed upper bounds for human health risk uncertainty; while for the 14 most widely used pesticides, there are at least 310 computed implied dose limits (28.0% of the total) that are above the acceptable daily intake values. The results show that some worldwide standard values were not derived conservatively enough to avoid human health risk by the pesticides, and that some values were not computed comprehensively by considering all major human exposure pathways.

Suggested Citation

  • Zijian Li & Aaron Jennings, 2017. "Worldwide Regulations of Standard Values of Pesticides for Human Health Risk Control: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-41, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:7:p:826-:d:105619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/7/826/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/7/826/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eduardo C. Reynoso & Ricardo D. Peña & Delfino Reyes & Yaselda Chavarin-Pineda & Ilaria Palchetti & Eduardo Torres, 2020. "Determination of Glyphosate in Water from a Rural Locality in México and Its Implications for the Population Based on Water Consumption and Use Habits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Nicolas López-Gálvez & Rietta Wagoner & Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá & Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne & Melissa Furlong & El'gin Avila & Paloma Beamer, 2019. "Systematic Literature Review of the Take-Home Route of Pesticide Exposure via Biomonitoring and Environmental Monitoring," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Charles A. Osunla & Anthony I. Okoh, 2017. "Vibrio Pathogens: A Public Health Concern in Rural Water Resources in Sub-Saharan Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-27, October.
    4. Stephen C. Bondy & Arezoo Campbell, 2017. "Water Quality and Brain Function," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Zhanping Hu, 2020. "What Socio-Economic and Political Factors Lead to Global Pesticide Dependence? A Critical Review from a Social Science Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Andreia F. Mesquita & Fernando J. M. Gonçalves & Ana M. M. Gonçalves, 2023. "The Lethal and Sub-Lethal Effects of Fluorinated and Copper-Based Pesticides—A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Marina Teófilo Pignati & Juarez Carlos Brito Pezzuti & Larissa Costa de Souza & Marcelo De Oliveira Lima & Wanderlei Antonio Pignati & Rosivaldo De Alcântara Mendes, 2018. "Assessment of Mercury Concentration in Turtles ( Podocnemis unifilis ) in the Xingu River Basin, Brazil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, June.
    8. Jin-Jing Xiao & Yang Li & Qing-Kui Fang & Yan-Hong Shi & Min Liao & Xiang-Wei Wu & Ri-Mao Hua & Hai-Qun Cao, 2017. "Factors Affecting Transfer of Pyrethroid Residues from Herbal Teas to Infusion and Influence of Physicochemical Properties of Pesticides," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-12, September.
    9. Ibrahim I. Shabbaj & Mansour A. Alghamdi & Magdy Shamy & Salwa K. Hassan & Musaab M. Alsharif & Mamdouh I. Khoder, 2017. "Risk Assessment and Implication of Human Exposure to Road Dust Heavy Metals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Siyu Gong & Bo Wang & Zhigang Yu, 2022. "Whether the Use of the Internet Can Assist Farmers in Selecting Biopesticides or Not: A Study Based on Evidence from the Largest Rice-Producing Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Margaret J. Eggers & John T. Doyle & Myra J. Lefthand & Sara L. Young & Anita L. Moore-Nall & Larry Kindness & Roberta Other Medicine & Timothy E. Ford & Eric Dietrich & Albert E. Parker & Joseph H. H, 2018. "Community Engaged Cumulative Risk Assessment of Exposure to Inorganic Well Water Contaminants, Crow Reservation, Montana," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-34, January.
    12. Sabrina Tait & Gabriele Lori & Roberta Tassinari & Cinzia La Rocca & Francesca Maranghi, 2022. "In Vitro Assessment and Toxicological Prioritization of Pesticide Mixtures at Concentrations Derived from Real Exposure in Occupational Scenarios," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Hans-Peter Hutter & Michael Kundi & Kathrin Lemmerer & Michael Poteser & Lisbeth Weitensfelder & Peter Wallner & Hanns Moshammer, 2018. "Subjective Symptoms of Male Workers Linked to Occupational Pesticide Exposure on Coffee Plantations in the Jarabacoa Region, Dominican Republic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-10, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:7:p:826-:d:105619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.