IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i5p467-d96954.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Viability of Legionella pneumophila in Water Samples: A Comparison of Propidium Monoazide (PMA) Treatment on Membrane Filters and in Liquid

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Bonetta

    (Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, P.zza Polonia 94, 10126 Torino, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to the work.)

  • Cristina Pignata

    (Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, P.zza Polonia 94, 10126 Torino, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to the work.)

  • Silvia Bonetta

    (Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, P.zza Polonia 94, 10126 Torino, Italy)

  • Lorenza Meucci

    (Società Metropolitana Acque Torino S.p.A., C.so XI Febbraio, 14, 10152 Torino, Italy)

  • Donatella Giacosa

    (Società Metropolitana Acque Torino S.p.A., C.so XI Febbraio, 14, 10152 Torino, Italy)

  • Elena Marino

    (Società Metropolitana Acque Torino S.p.A., C.so XI Febbraio, 14, 10152 Torino, Italy)

  • Giorgio Gilli

    (Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, P.zza Polonia 94, 10126 Torino, Italy)

  • Elisabetta Carraro

    (Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, P.zza Polonia 94, 10126 Torino, Italy)

Abstract

Legionella pneumophila is a ubiquitous microorganism widely distributed in aquatic environments and can cause Legionellosis in humans. A promising approach to detect viable cells in water samples involves the use of quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in combination with photoactivatable DNA intercalator propidium monoazide (PMA). However, the PMA efficiency could be different depending on the experimental conditions used. The aim of this study was to compare two PMA exposure protocols: (A) directly on the membrane filter or (B) in liquid after filter washing. The overall PMA-induced qPCR means reductions in heat-killed L. pneumophila cells were 2.42 and 1.91 log units for exposure protocols A and B, respectively. A comparison between the results obtained reveals that filter exposure allows a higher PMA-qPCR signal reduction to be reached, mainly at low concentrations ( p < 0.05). This confirms the potential use of this method to quantify L. pneumophila in water with low contamination.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Bonetta & Cristina Pignata & Silvia Bonetta & Lorenza Meucci & Donatella Giacosa & Elena Marino & Giorgio Gilli & Elisabetta Carraro, 2017. "Viability of Legionella pneumophila in Water Samples: A Comparison of Propidium Monoazide (PMA) Treatment on Membrane Filters and in Liquid," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-8, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:5:p:467-:d:96954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/5/467/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/5/467/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Savina Ditommaso & Monica Giacomuzzi & Elisa Ricciardi & Carla M. Zotti, 2016. "Cultural and Molecular Evidence of Legionella spp. Colonization in Dental Unit Waterlines: Which Is the Best Method for Risk Assessment?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-10, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Savina Ditommaso & Monica Giacomuzzi & Elisa Ricciardi & Carla M. Zotti, 2016. "Efficacy of a Low Dose of Hydrogen Peroxide (Peroxy Ag + ) for Continuous Treatment of Dental Unit Water Lines: Challenge Test with Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1 in a Simulated Dental Unit Waterl," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-10, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:5:p:467-:d:96954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.