IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i1p67-d87552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incidence and Simple Prediction Model of Hyperuricemia for Urban Han Chinese Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Cao

    (Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China)

  • Chunxia Wang

    (Health Management Center, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272000, Shandong, China)

  • Guang Zhang

    (Health Management Center, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China)

  • Xiang Ji

    (Geriatrics Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China)

  • Yanxun Liu

    (Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China)

  • Xiubin Sun

    (Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China)

  • Zhongshang Yuan

    (Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China)

  • Zheng Jiang

    (Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China)

  • Fuzhong Xue

    (Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China)

Abstract

Background: Hyperuricemia (HUA) contributes to gout and many other diseases. Many hyperuricemia-related risk factors have been discovered, which provided the possibility for building the hyperuricemia prediction model. In this study we aimed to explore the incidence of hyperuricemia and develop hyperuricemia prediction models based on the routine biomarkers for both males and females in urban Han Chinese adults. Methods: A cohort of 58,542 members of the urban population (34,980 males and 23,562 females) aged 20–80 years old, free of hyperuricemia at baseline examination, was followed up for a median 2.5 years. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to develop gender-specific prediction models. Harrell’s C-statistics was used to evaluate the discrimination ability of the models, and the 10-fold cross-validation was used to validate the models. Results: In 7139 subjects (5585 males and 1554 females), hyperuricemia occurred during a median of 2.5 years of follow-up, leading to a total incidence density of 49.63/1000 person years (64.62/1000 person years for males and 27.12/1000 person years for females). The predictors of hyperuricemia were age, body mass index (BMI) systolic blood pressure, serum uric acid for males, and BMI, systolic blood pressure, serum uric acid, triglycerides for females. The models’ C statistics were 0.783 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.779–0.786) for males and 0.784 (95% CI, 0.778–0.789) for females. After 10-fold cross-validation, the C statistics were still steady, with 0.782 for males and 0.783 for females. Conclusions: In this study, gender-specific prediction models for hyperuricemia for urban Han Chinese adults were developed and performed well.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Cao & Chunxia Wang & Guang Zhang & Xiang Ji & Yanxun Liu & Xiubin Sun & Zhongshang Yuan & Zheng Jiang & Fuzhong Xue, 2017. "Incidence and Simple Prediction Model of Hyperuricemia for Urban Han Chinese Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:1:p:67-:d:87552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/1/67/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/1/67/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruiqi Shan & Yi Ning & Yuan Ma & Xiang Gao & Zechen Zhou & Cheng Jin & Jing Wu & Jun Lv & Liming Li, 2021. "Incidence and Risk Factors of Hyperuricemia among 2.5 Million Chinese Adults during the Years 2017–2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-11, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:1:p:67-:d:87552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.