IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i1p61-d87382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surveillance of Clostridium difficile Infections: Results from a Six-Year Retrospective Study in Nine Hospitals of a North Italian Local Health Authority

Author

Listed:
  • Greta Roncarati

    (Unit of Microbiology, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, Bologna 40138, Italy)

  • Laura Dallolio

    (Unit of Hygiene, Public Health and Medical Statistics, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Via San Giacomo 12, Bologna 40126, Italy)

  • Erica Leoni

    (Unit of Hygiene, Public Health and Medical Statistics, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Via San Giacomo 12, Bologna 40126, Italy)

  • Manuela Panico

    (Direction of Maggiore Hospital, Local Health Authority of Bologna, Via Largo Nigrisoli 2, Bologna 40133, Italy)

  • Angela Zanni

    (Unit of Hygiene and Quality of Residential Services, Bellaria Hospital, Local Health Authority of Bologna, Via Altura 3, Bologna 40139, Italy)

  • Patrizia Farruggia

    (Unit of Hygiene and Quality of Residential Services, Bellaria Hospital, Local Health Authority of Bologna, Via Altura 3, Bologna 40139, Italy)

Abstract

Clostridium difficile is an emerging cause of healthcare associated infections. In nine hospitals of an Italian Local Health Authority the episodes of C. difficile infection (CDI) were identified using the data registered by the centralized Laboratory Information System, from 2010 to 2015. CDI incidence (positive patients for A and/or B toxins per patients-days) was analysed per year, hospital, and ward. A number of cases approximately equivalent to the mean of identified cases per year were studied retrospectively to highlight the risk factors associated to CDI and their severity. Nine hundred and forty-two patients affected by CDI were identified. The overall incidence was 3.7/10,000 patients-days, with a stable trend across the six years and the highest rates observed in smaller and outlying hospitals (up to 17.8/10,000), where the admitted patients were older and the wards with the highest incidences (long-term-care: 7.6/10,000, general medicine: 5.7/10,000) were more represented. The mean age of patients in each hospital was correlated with CDI rates. Of the 101 cases selected for the retrospective study, 86.1% were healthcare associated, 10.9% community acquired; 9.1% met the criteria for recurrent case and 23.8% for severe case of CDI. The overall mortality rate was 28.7%. Comorbidity conditions occurred in 91.1%, previous exposure to antibiotics in 76.2%, and proton pump inhibitors in 77.2%. Recurrent and severe cases were significantly associated with renal insufficiency and creatinine levels ≥2 mg/dL. The survey based on the centralized laboratory data was useful to study CDI epidemiology in the different centres in order to identify possible weaknesses and plan control strategies, in particular the reinforcement of staff training, mainly targeted at compliance with contact precautions and hand hygiene.

Suggested Citation

  • Greta Roncarati & Laura Dallolio & Erica Leoni & Manuela Panico & Angela Zanni & Patrizia Farruggia, 2017. "Surveillance of Clostridium difficile Infections: Results from a Six-Year Retrospective Study in Nine Hospitals of a North Italian Local Health Authority," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:1:p:61-:d:87382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/1/61/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/1/61/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giuliana Fabbri & Manuela Panico & Laura Dallolio & Roberta Suzzi & Matilde Ciccia & Fabrizio Sandri & Patrizia Farruggia, 2013. "Outbreak of Ampicillin/Piperacillin-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU): Investigation and Control Measures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-8, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:1:p:61-:d:87382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.