IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i11p1409-d119342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sleep and Dietary Patterns in Pregnancy: Findings from the GUSTO Cohort

Author

Listed:
  • Linde Van Lee

    (Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 117549, Singapore)

  • Ai-Ru Chia

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore 119074, Singapore)

  • See Ling Loy

    (Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
    Department of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore 229899, Singapore)

  • Marjorelee Colega

    (Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 117549, Singapore)

  • Elaine K. H. Tham

    (Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 117549, Singapore)

  • Shirong Cai

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore 119074, Singapore)

  • Fabian Yap

    (Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
    Department of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore 229899, Singapore
    Department of Pediatrics, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore 229899, Singapore
    Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308232, Singapore)

  • Keith M. Godfrey

    (MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
    NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK)

  • Oon Hoe Teoh

    (Department of Pediatrics, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore 229899, Singapore)

  • Daniel Goh

    (Department of Pediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore)

  • Kok Hian Tan

    (Department of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore 229899, Singapore)

  • Yap-Seng Chong

    (Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 117549, Singapore
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore 119074, Singapore)

  • Birit F. P. Broekman

    (Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 117549, Singapore
    Department of Psychiatry, VU Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Mary F.F. Chong

    (Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 117549, Singapore
    Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Tahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2, #09-01Q, Singapore 117549, Singapore
    Clinical Nutrition Research Center, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 117609, Singapore)

Abstract

Evidence on the association between sleep, diet, and eating behaviors in pregnant women is lacking. We examine this in a cohort of apparently healthy pregnant women. At 26–28 weeks gestation, 497 participants completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index to assess sleep and a 24-h recall to assess dietary intake. Diet quality was assessed by the Healthy Eating Index for pregnant women in Singapore (HEI-SGP) score and previously derived dietary patterns (vegetables-fruit-rice, seafood-noodles, and pasta-cheese-meat pattern). Eating behaviors studied included the longest night-time fasting interval, frequency of consumption occasions, energy from discretionary foods, and nighttime eating. Adjusted means were estimated between poor/good quality and short/normal sleepers using linear regressions, including covariates. Good sleep quality versus poor sleep quality, was associated with better diet quality (mean HEI-SGP 54.6 vs. 52.0; p = 0.032), greater adherence to the vegetables-fruit-rice pattern (mean 0.03 vs. −0.15; p = 0.039), lesser adherence to the seafood-noodle pattern (mean −0.14 vs. 0.03; p = 0.024), and a trending lower calories from discretionary foods (mean 330.5 vs. 382.6 kcal; p = 0.073), after adjusting for covariates. After additional adjustment for anxiety, only sleep quality and the seafood-noodle pattern remained significantly associated ( p = 0.018). Short sleep was not associated with any diet or eating behavior. In conclusion, good sleep quality is associated with a better diet quality and a greater adherence to the vegetable-fruit-rice pattern, but with lesser adherence to the seafood-noodle diets in pregnant women.

Suggested Citation

  • Linde Van Lee & Ai-Ru Chia & See Ling Loy & Marjorelee Colega & Elaine K. H. Tham & Shirong Cai & Fabian Yap & Keith M. Godfrey & Oon Hoe Teoh & Daniel Goh & Kok Hian Tan & Yap-Seng Chong & Birit F. P, 2017. "Sleep and Dietary Patterns in Pregnancy: Findings from the GUSTO Cohort," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:11:p:1409-:d:119342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/11/1409/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/11/1409/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ijaz Ul Haq & Zahula Mariyam & Min Li & Xiaojia Huang & Pan Jiang & Falak Zeb & Xiaoyue Wu & Qing Feng & Ming Zhou, 2018. "A Comparative Study of Nutritional Status, Knowledge Attitude and Practices (KAP) and Dietary Intake between International and Chinese Students in Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Heng Yaw Yong & Zalilah Mohd Shariff & Barakatun Nisak Mohd Yusof & Zulida Rejali & Yvonne Yee Siang Tee & Jacques Bindels & Eline M. van der Beek, 2019. "Pre-Pregnancy BMI Influences the Association of Dietary Quality and Gestational Weight Gain: The SECOST Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:11:p:1409-:d:119342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.