IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i11p1343-d117590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In-Class Cycling to Augment College Student Academic Performance and Reduce Physical Inactivity: Results from an RCT

Author

Listed:
  • Lanae Joubert

    (School of Health and Human Performance, Northern Michigan University, Marquette , MI 49855, USA)

  • Matthew Kilgas

    (Department of Kinesiology and Integrative Physiology, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA)

  • Alexandrea Riley

    (School of Health and Human Performance, Northern Michigan University, Marquette , MI 49855, USA)

  • Yuba Gautam

    (School of Health and Human Performance, Northern Michigan University, Marquette , MI 49855, USA)

  • Lars Donath

    (Institute of Training and Computer Science in Sport, German Sport University Cologne, 50933 Köln, Germany)

  • Scott Drum

    (School of Health and Human Performance, Northern Michigan University, Marquette , MI 49855, USA)

Abstract

Most college students sit 14 hours per week on average, excluding sedentary study time. Researchers observing workplace and elementary school settings with active workstations to combat sedentary behavior have shown enhanced cognition without distraction. Until now, incorporating active workstations in college classroom settings remained relatively unexplored. This study’s purpose was to assess academic performance using in-class stationary cycle desks during a semester-long lecture course. Twenty-one college students (19–24 years) enrolled in a lecture course volunteered and were split into traditional sit (SIT) and stationary cycle (CYC) groups randomly, matched on a calculated factor equal to a physical activity (PA) score (0–680) multiplied by grade point average (GPA; 4.0 scale). CYC pedaled a prescribed rate of perceived exertion (RPE) of less than 2 out of 10 during a 50-min lecture, 3 × week for 12 weeks. CYC averaged 42 min, 7.9 miles, and 1.7 RPE during class throughout the semester. No significant differences ( p > 0.05) were observed between CYC and SIT on in-class test scores or overall course grades. Although statistically insignificant, CYC had higher mean test scores and overall course grades vs. SIT (i.e., B + vs. B, respectively). Low intensity cycling during a college lecture course maintained student academic performance and possibly reduced weekly sedentary behavior time.

Suggested Citation

  • Lanae Joubert & Matthew Kilgas & Alexandrea Riley & Yuba Gautam & Lars Donath & Scott Drum, 2017. "In-Class Cycling to Augment College Student Academic Performance and Reduce Physical Inactivity: Results from an RCT," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-9, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:11:p:1343-:d:117590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/11/1343/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/11/1343/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avner Ben-Ner & Darla J Hamann & Gabriel Koepp & Chimnay U Manohar & James Levine, 2014. "Treadmill Workstations: The Effects of Walking while Working on Physical Activity and Work Performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-11, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chelsea Carpenter & Sang-Eun Byun & Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy & Delia West, 2021. "An Exploration of Domain-Specific Sedentary Behaviors in College Students by Lifestyle Factors and Sociodemographics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Corina Nüesch & Jan-Niklas Kreppke & Annegret Mündermann & Lars Donath, 2018. "Effects of a Dynamic Chair on Chair Seat Motion and Trunk Muscle Activity during Office Tasks and Task Transitions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Julia Lynch & Gráinne O’Donoghue & Casey L. Peiris, 2022. "Classroom Movement Breaks and Physically Active Learning Are Feasible, Reduce Sedentary Behaviour and Fatigue, and May Increase Focus in University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anıl Onur Mercanoğlu & Kerem Yıldırım Şimşek, 2023. "The Impact of Employee Recreation on Their Respective Productivity," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    2. Kelly Mackenzie & Elizabeth Such & Paul Norman & Elizabeth Goyder, 2021. "Using Co-Production to Develop “Sit Less at Work” Interventions in a Range of Organisations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Bradley MacDonald & Xanne Janssen & Alison Kirk & Mhairi Patience & Ann-Marie Gibson, 2018. "An Integrative, Systematic Review Exploring the Research, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of Interventions to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour in Office Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-29, December.
    4. Samson O. Ojo & Daniel P. Bailey & Angel M. Chater & David J. Hewson, 2018. "The Impact of Active Workstations on Workplace Productivity and Performance: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Zhe Wang & Chunhong Liu & Shuai Yang & Lei Li, 2018. "Employee Fitness Programs: Exploring Relationships between Perceived Organizational Support toward Employee Fitness and Organizational Sustainability Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:11:p:1343-:d:117590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.