IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i7p729-d74256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geographical Inequalities in Surgical Treatment for Localized Female Breast Cancer, Queensland, Australia 1997–2011: Improvements over Time but Inequalities Remain

Author

Listed:
  • Peter D. Baade

    (Cancer Council Queensland, P.O. Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004, Australia
    School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
    Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia)

  • Paramita Dasgupta

    (Cancer Council Queensland, P.O. Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004, Australia)

  • Philippa H. Youl

    (Cancer Council Queensland, P.O. Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004, Australia
    Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia
    School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Herston Road, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia)

  • Christopher Pyke

    (Mater Medical Centre, 293 Vulture Street, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia)

  • Joanne F. Aitken

    (Cancer Council Queensland, P.O. Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004, Australia
    Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia
    School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4006, Australia
    Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba 4350, Australia)

Abstract

The uptake of breast conserving surgery (BCS) for early stage breast cancer varies by where women live. We investigate whether these geographical patterns have changed over time using population-based data linkage between cancer registry records and hospital inpatient episodes. The study cohort consisted of 11,631 women aged 20 years and over diagnosed with a single primary invasive localised breast cancer between 1997 and 2011 in Queensland, Australia who underwent either BCS ( n = 9223, 79%) or mastectomy ( n = 2408, 21%). After adjustment for socio-demographic and clinical factors, compared to women living in very high accessibility areas, women in high (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.58 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.49, 0.69)), low (OR 0.47 (0.41, 0.54)) and very low (OR 0.44 (0.34, 0.56)) accessibility areas had lower odds of having BCS, while the odds for women from middle (OR 0.81 (0.69, 0.94)) and most disadvantaged (OR 0.87 (0.71, 0.98)) areas was significantly lower than women living in affluent areas. The association between accessibility and the type of surgery reduced over time (interaction p = 0.028) but not for area disadvantage (interaction p = 0.209). In making informed decisions about surgical treatment, it is crucial that any geographical-related barriers to implementing their preferred treatment are minimised.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter D. Baade & Paramita Dasgupta & Philippa H. Youl & Christopher Pyke & Joanne F. Aitken, 2016. "Geographical Inequalities in Surgical Treatment for Localized Female Breast Cancer, Queensland, Australia 1997–2011: Improvements over Time but Inequalities Remain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:7:p:729-:d:74256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/7/729/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/7/729/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:7:p:729-:d:74256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.