IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i7p670-d73239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approaches to Children’s Exposure Assessment: Case Study with Diethylhexylphthalate (DEHP)

Author

Listed:
  • Gary Ginsberg

    (Partnership in Pediatric and Environment Health, Granby, CT 06026, USA)

  • Justine Ginsberg

    (Partnership in Pediatric and Environment Health, Granby, CT 06026, USA)

  • Brenda Foos

    (United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Children’s Health Protection, Washington, DC 20460, USA)

Abstract

Children’s exposure assessment is a key input into epidemiology studies, risk assessment and source apportionment. The goals of this article are to describe a methodology for children’s exposure assessment that can be used for these purposes and to apply the methodology to source apportionment for the case study chemical, diethylhexylphthalate (DEHP). A key feature is the comparison of total (aggregate) exposure calculated via a pathways approach to that derived from a biomonitoring approach. The 4-step methodology and its results for DEHP are: (1) Prioritization of life stages and exposure pathways, with pregnancy, breast-fed infants, and toddlers the focus of the case study and pathways selected that are relevant to these groups; (2) Estimation of pathway-specific exposures by life stage wherein diet was found to be the largest contributor for pregnant women, breast milk and mouthing behavior for the nursing infant and diet, house dust, and mouthing for toddlers; (3) Comparison of aggregate exposure by pathways vs biomonitoring-based approaches wherein good concordance was found for toddlers and pregnant women providing confidence in the exposure assessment; (4) Source apportionment in which DEHP presence in foods, children’s products, consumer products and the built environment are discussed with respect to early life mouthing, house dust and dietary exposure. A potential fifth step of the method involves the calculation of exposure doses for risk assessment which is described but outside the scope for the current case study. In summary, the methodology has been used to synthesize the available information to identify key sources of early life exposure to DEHP.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary Ginsberg & Justine Ginsberg & Brenda Foos, 2016. "Approaches to Children’s Exposure Assessment: Case Study with Diethylhexylphthalate (DEHP)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:7:p:670-:d:73239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/7/670/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/7/670/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maryam Zare Jeddi & Mohamad Eshaghi Gorji & Ivonne M. C. M. Rietjens & Jochem Louisse & Yuri Bruinen de Bruin & Roman Liska, 2018. "Biomonitoring and Subsequent Risk Assessment of Combined Exposure to Phthalates in Iranian Children and Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Alesia Ferguson & Rosalind Penney & Helena Solo-Gabriele, 2017. "A Review of the Field on Children’s Exposure to Environmental Contaminants: A Risk Assessment Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Alesia Ferguson & Helena Solo-Gabriele, 2016. "Children’s Exposure to Environmental Contaminants: An Editorial Reflection of Articles in the IJERPH Special Issue Entitled, “Children’s Exposure to Environmental Contaminants”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-10, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:7:p:670-:d:73239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.