IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i6p523-d70744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urolithiasis, Urinary Cancer, and Home Drinking Water Source in the United States Territory of Guam, 2006–2010

Author

Listed:
  • Robert L. Haddock

    (Guam Department of Public Health and Social Services, 123 Chalan Kareta, Mangilao, GU 96913, USA)

  • David R. Olson

    (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, 4770 Buford Hwy., NE (Mail Stop F-60), Atlanta, GA 30341, USA)

  • Lorraine Backer

    (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, 4770 Buford Hwy., NE (Mail Stop F-60), Atlanta, GA 30341, USA)

  • Josephine Malilay

    (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, 4770 Buford Hwy., NE (Mail Stop F-60), Atlanta, GA 30341, USA)

Abstract

We reviewed patient records with a first-listed diagnosis of urolithiasis—also known as urinary tract or kidney stone disease, nephrolithiasis—upon discharge from Guam’s sole civilian hospital during 2006 to 2010 and urinary cancer mortality records from the Guam Cancer Registry for 1970 to 2009 to determine the source of municipal water supplied to the patients’ residence. The objective was to investigate a possible relationship between the sources of municipal water supplied to Guam villages and the incidence of urolithiasis and urinary cancer. We analyzed hospital discharge diagnoses of urolithiasis or renal calculi by calculating the incidence of first-mentioned discharge for urolithiasis or renal calculi and comparing rates across demographic or geographic categories while adjusting by age, sex, and ethnicity/race. We reviewed cancer registry records of urinary cancer deaths by patient residence. The annual incidence of hospitalization for urolithiasis was 5.22 per 10,000. Rates adjusted for sex or age exhibited almost no change. The rate of 9.83 per 10,000 among Chamorros was significantly higher ( p < 0.05) than the rates among any other ethnic group or race. When villages were grouped by water source, rates of patients discharged with a first-listed diagnosis of urolithiasis, adjusted for ethnicity/race, were similar for villages using either well water (5.44 per 10,000) or mixed source water (5.39 per 10,000), and significantly greater than the rate for villages using exclusively reservoir water (1.35 per 10,000). No statistically significant differences were found between the water source or village of residence and urinary cancer mortality. Some Guam residents living in villages served completely or partly by deep well water high in calcium carbonate may be at increased risk for urolithiasis compared with residents living in villages served by surface waters. Although the risk appears to be highest in villagers of Chamorro ethnicity, residents should be aware of other contributing risk factors and steps to take to avoid developing this health problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert L. Haddock & David R. Olson & Lorraine Backer & Josephine Malilay, 2016. "Urolithiasis, Urinary Cancer, and Home Drinking Water Source in the United States Territory of Guam, 2006–2010," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-8, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:6:p:523-:d:70744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/6/523/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/6/523/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:6:p:523-:d:70744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.