IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i2p156-d62806.html

Smoke-Free Public Policies and Voluntary Policies in Personal Settings in Tbilisi, Georgia: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Carla J. Berg

    (Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, NE, Room 524, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Samantha A. Smith

    (Health Promotion and Wellness Directorate Army Public Health Center, 8506 Dawnridge Dr., Houston, TX 77071, USA)

  • Ta Misha Bascombe

    (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Nino Maglakelidze

    (National Center for Disease Control, 9 M. Asatiani st. Tbilisi, GA 0177, USA)

  • Lela Starua

    (National Center for Disease Control, 9 M. Asatiani st. Tbilisi, GA 0177, USA)

  • Marina Topuridze

    (National Center for Disease Control, 9 M. Asatiani st. Tbilisi, GA 0177, USA)

Abstract

Georgia has limited tobacco control policies, particularly in the area of smoke-free public policies, which may influence the adoption of smoke-free home rules. We qualitatively examined knowledge about and reactions to public and personal smoke-free policies among Tbilisi residents. In Spring 2014, we conducted six focus groups among 47 total participants—two among male smokers, one among male nonsmokers, two among female smokers, and one among female nonsmokers. Our sample was 48.9% male and 70.2% past 30-day smokers. Most believed that SHS was dangerous, with particular concern regarding the impact of SHS on children and pregnant women. Many had misconceptions about how to protect others from SHS and the effectiveness of some approaches. Many indicated that they had some type of home rules, but few reported a complete ban on smoking in the home. Even when some restrictions were in place, they rarely were effective or enforced. Common concerns about the partial smoke-free public policy in Georgia included its economic impact, perceived discrimination among smokers, and the policy being against the Georgian culture. These concerns were heightened when participants were asked about the possible implementation of a complete smoke-free policy. Educational programs are needed to promote smoke-free policies in Georgia.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla J. Berg & Samantha A. Smith & Ta Misha Bascombe & Nino Maglakelidze & Lela Starua & Marina Topuridze, 2016. "Smoke-Free Public Policies and Voluntary Policies in Personal Settings in Tbilisi, Georgia: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:2:p:156-:d:62806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/2/156/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/2/156/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wbk:wbpubs:7039 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marina Topuridze & Carla J. Berg & Ana Dekanosidze & Arevik Torosyan & Lilit Grigoryan & Alexander Bazarchyan & Zhanna Sargsyan & Varduhi Hayrumyan & Nino Maglakelidze & Lela Sturua & Regine Haardörfe, 2020. "Smokers’ and Nonsmokers’ Receptivity to Smoke-Free Policies and Pro- and Anti-Policy Messaging in Armenia and Georgia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:2:p:156-:d:62806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.