IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i1p128-d62163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupants’ Perceptions of Amenity and Efficiency for Verification of Spatial Design Adequacy

Author

Listed:
  • Sangwon Lee

    (Graduate School of Culture Technology, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, Korea)

  • Kwangyun Wohn

    (Graduate School of Culture Technology, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, Korea)

Abstract

The best spatial design condition to satisfy the occupancy needs of amenity and efficiency is determined through analyzing the spatial design adequacy (SDA). In this study, the relationship between the space design elements and space on future occupants’ perception are analyzed. The thirty-three participants reported their self-evaluated SDA that describes the quality of eight alternative housing living rooms with different spatial factors. The occupants were guided through the perception processing elaboration in order for them to evaluate the actual perception in the real space. The findings demonstrated that the spatial size (e.g., width, depth, and height) is significantly correlated with the overall satisfaction of amenity. It is also found that the spatial shape (e.g., the width-to-depth ratio, the height-to-area ratio, and room shape) may significantly influence the overall satisfaction of efficiency. The findings also demonstrate that the causal relationship between the spatial factors and space is clearly present in the occupants’ perception, reflecting the time-sequential characteristics of the actual experience divided into amenity and efficiency. This result indicates that the correlation between the spatial factors and space of SDA under the occupants’ perception processing elaboration can be a useful guide to predict the occupancy satisfaction of amenity and efficiency in real spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Sangwon Lee & Kwangyun Wohn, 2016. "Occupants’ Perceptions of Amenity and Efficiency for Verification of Spatial Design Adequacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-31, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:128-:d:62163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/1/128/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/1/128/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:128-:d:62163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.