IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i11p1147-d83028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Safety Attitudes of Senior Managers in the Chinese Coal Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Jiangshi Zhang

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Na Chen

    (School of Mechanics and Engineering Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Gui Fu

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Mingwei Yan

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Young-Chan Kim

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, 2350 Hayward St., G.G. Brown Building, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)

Abstract

Introduction: Senior managers’ attitudes towards safety are very important regarding the safety practices in an organization. The study is to describe the current situation of senior managers′ attitudes towards safety in the Chinese coal industry. Method : We evaluated the changing trends as well as the reasons for these changes in the Chinese coal industry in 2009 and in 2014 with 168 senior manager samples from large Chinese state-owned coal enterprises. Evaluations of 15 safety concepts were performed by means of a questionnaire. Results and Conclusions : Results indicate that, in 2014, three concepts were at a very high level (mean > 4.5), and six were at a relatively high level (4.5 > mean > 4.0). Analyses of changing trends revealed that nine concepts improved significantly, while four greatly declined in 2014 compared to those in 2009. The data reported here suggest that the reasons for the significant improvement with respect to the nine concepts include the improvement in social and legal environments, the improvement of the culture of social safety, workers′ safety demands being met, and scientific and technical advances in the coal industry. The decline of the four concepts seemed to be caused by a poor awareness of managers in the coal industry that safety creates economic benefits, insufficient information on safety, inadequate attention to the development of a safety culture and safety management methods, and safety organizations and workers′ unions not playing their role effectively. Practical Applications : We therefore recommend strengthening the evidence that safety creates economic benefits, providing incentives for employees to encourage their participation in safety management, and paying more attention to the prevention of accidents in coal mines via safety organizations and unions. These results can provide guidelines for workers, industrialists, and government regarding occupational safety in the whole coal industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiangshi Zhang & Na Chen & Gui Fu & Mingwei Yan & Young-Chan Kim, 2016. "The Safety Attitudes of Senior Managers in the Chinese Coal Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:11:p:1147-:d:83028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/11/1147/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/11/1147/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuanlong Li & Jingqi Gao & Chongyang Qian & Xiang Wu, 2022. "The Mediation Role of Safety Attitude in the Impact of Resilience on the Safety Behavior of Coal Miners in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Tianmo Zhou & Yunqiang Zhu & Kai Sun & Jialin Chen & Shu Wang & Huazhong Zhu & Xiaoshuang Wang, 2022. "Variance Analysis in China’s Coal Mine Accident Studies Based on Data Mining," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Lixia Niu & Rui Zhao, 2022. "The Effect of Safety Attitudes on Coal Miners’ Human Errors: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:11:p:1147-:d:83028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.