IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v11y2014i11p12001-12014d42562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Chemical Risk Ranking and Scoring Method for the Selection of Harmful Substances to be Specially Controlled in Occupational Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Saemi Shin

    (Department of Environmental Health, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul 136-703, Korea)

  • Hyung-Il Moon

    (Department of Environmental Health, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul 136-703, Korea)

  • Kwon Seob Lee

    (Occupational Safety & Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency, Ulsan 339-30, Korea)

  • Mun Ki Hong

    (Occupational Safety & Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency, Ulsan 339-30, Korea)

  • Sang-Hoon Byeon

    (Department of Environmental Health, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul 136-703, Korea)

Abstract

This study aimed to devise a method for prioritizing hazardous chemicals for further regulatory action. To accomplish this objective, we chose appropriate indicators and algorithms. Nine indicators from the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals were used to identify categories to which the authors assigned numerical scores. Exposure indicators included handling volume, distribution, and exposure level. To test the method devised by this study, sixty-two harmful substances controlled by the Occupational Safety and Health Act in Korea, including acrylamide, acrylonitrile, and styrene were ranked using this proposed method. The correlation coefficients between total score and each indicator ranged from 0.160 to 0.641, and those between total score and hazard indicators ranged from 0.603 to 0.641. The latter were higher than the correlation coefficients between total score and exposure indicators, which ranged from 0.160 to 0.421. Correlations between individual indicators were low (−0.240 to 0.376), except for those between handling volume and distribution (0.613), suggesting that each indicator was not strongly correlated. The low correlations between each indicator mean that the indicators and independent and were well chosen for prioritizing harmful chemicals. This method proposed by this study can improve the cost efficiency of chemical management as utilized in occupational regulatory systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Saemi Shin & Hyung-Il Moon & Kwon Seob Lee & Mun Ki Hong & Sang-Hoon Byeon, 2014. "A Chemical Risk Ranking and Scoring Method for the Selection of Harmful Substances to be Specially Controlled in Occupational Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:11:p:12001-12014:d:42562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/11/12001/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/11/12001/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hong Lyuer Lim & Eun-Hae Huh & Da-An Huh & Jong-Ryeul Sohn & Kyong Whan Moon, 2019. "Priority Setting for the Management of Chemicals Using the Globally Harmonized System and Multivariate Analysis: Use of the Mahalanobis-Taguchi System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Da-An Huh & Hong Lyuer Lim & Jong-Ryeul Sohn & Sang-Hoon Byeon & Soonyoung Jung & Woo-Kyun Lee & Kyong Whan Moon, 2018. "Development of a Screening Method for Health Hazard Ranking and Scoring of Chemicals Using the Mahalanobis–Taguchi System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-11, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:11:p:12001-12014:d:42562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.