IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v11y2014i11p11177-11191d41659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Select Analytes in Exhaled Aerosol from E-Cigarettes with Exhaled Smoke from a Conventional Cigarette and Exhaled Breaths

Author

Listed:
  • Gerald A. Long

    (Lorillard Tobacco Company, P.O. Box 21688, Greensboro, NC 27420, USA)

Abstract

Exhaled aerosols were collected following the use of two leading U.S. commercial electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and a conventional cigarette by human subjects and analyzed for phenolics, carbonyls, water, glycerin and nicotine using a vacuum-assisted filter pad capture system. Exhaled breath blanks were determined for each subject prior to each product use and aerosol collection session. Distribution and mass balance of exhaled e-cigarette aerosol composition was greater than 99.9% water and glycerin, and a small amount (<0.06%) of nicotine. Total phenolic content in exhaled e-cigarette aerosol was not distinguishable from exhaled breath blanks, while total phenolics in exhaled cigarette smoke were significantly greater than in exhaled e-cigarette aerosol and exhaled breaths, averaging 66 µg/session (range 36 to 117 µg/session). The total carbonyls in exhaled e-cigarette aerosols were also not distinguishable from exhaled breaths or room air blanks. Total carbonyls in exhaled cigarette smoke was significantly greater than in exhaled e-cigarette aerosols, exhaled breath and room air blanks, averaging 242 µg/session (range 136 to 352 µg/session). These results indicate that exhaled e-cigarette aerosol does not increase bystander exposure for phenolics and carbonyls above the levels observed in exhaled breaths of air.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerald A. Long, 2014. "Comparison of Select Analytes in Exhaled Aerosol from E-Cigarettes with Exhaled Smoke from a Conventional Cigarette and Exhaled Breaths," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:11:p:11177-11191:d:41659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/11/11177/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/11/11177/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grant O'Connell & Stéphane Colard & Xavier Cahours & John D. Pritchard, 2015. "An Assessment of Indoor Air Quality before, during and after Unrestricted Use of E-Cigarettes in a Small Room," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Manoj Misra & Robert D. Leverette & Bethany T. Cooper & Melanee B. Bennett & Steven E. Brown, 2014. "Comparative In Vitro Toxicity Profile of Electronic and Tobacco Cigarettes, Smokeless Tobacco and Nicotine Replacement Therapy Products: E-Liquids, Extracts and Collected Aerosols," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Alex P. Carll & Claudia Arab & Renata Salatini & Meredith D. Miles & Matthew A. Nystoriak & Kyle L. Fulghum & Daniel W. Riggs & Gregg A. Shirk & Whitney S. Theis & Nima Talebi & Aruni Bhatnagar & Dani, 2022. "E-cigarettes and their lone constituents induce cardiac arrhythmia and conduction defects in mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Ali A. Rostami & Yezdi B. Pithawalla & Jianmin Liu & Michael J. Oldham & Karl A. Wagner & Kimberly Frost-Pineda & Mohamadi A. Sarkar, 2016. "A Well-Mixed Computational Model for Estimating Room Air Levels of Selected Constituents from E-Vapor Product Use," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:11:p:11177-11191:d:41659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.