IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v11y2013i1p187-201d31539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Some Employees Adopt or Resist Reorganization of Work Practices in Health Care: Associations between Perceived Loss of Resources, Burnout, and Attitudes to Change

Author

Listed:
  • Carl-Ardy Dubois

    (Faculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, C.P. 6128, succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada
    These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.)

  • Kathleen Bentein

    (Sciences de la Gestion, Université du Québec à Montréal, 315, Rue Sainte-Catherine Est, Montréal, QC H2X 3X2, Canada
    These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.)

  • Jamal Ben Mansour

    (Sciences de la Gestion, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351, Boul. des Forges, C.P. 500, Trois-Rivières, QC G9A 5H7, Canada
    These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.)

  • Frédéric Gilbert

    (Sciences de la Gestion, Université du Québec à Montréal, 315, Rue Sainte-Catherine Est, Montréal, QC H2X 3X2, Canada)

  • Jean-Luc Bédard

    (Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre Urbanisation Culture Société, 385, Rue Sherbrooke Est, Montréal, QC H2X 1E3, Canada)

Abstract

In recent years, successive work reorganization initiatives have been implemented in many healthcare settings. The failure of many of these change efforts has often been attributed in the prominent management discourse to change resistance. Few studies have paid attention to the temporal process of workers’ resource depletion/accumulation over time and its links with workers’ psychological states and reactions to change. Drawing upon the conservation of resources theory, this study examines associations between workers’ perceptions of loss of resources, burnout, and attitudes to change. The study was conducted in five health and social service centres in Quebec, in units where a work reorganization project was initiated. A prospective longitudinal design was used to assess workers’ perceptions at two time points 12 months apart. Our findings are consistent with the conservation of resources theory. The analysis of latent differences scores between times 1 and 2 showed that the perceived loss of resources was associated with emotional exhaustion, which, in turn, was negatively correlated with commitment to change and positively correlated with cynicism. In confirming the temporal relationship between perceived loss of resources, occupational burnout, and attitude to change, this research offers a new perspective to explain negative and positive reactions to change implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Carl-Ardy Dubois & Kathleen Bentein & Jamal Ben Mansour & Frédéric Gilbert & Jean-Luc Bédard, 2013. "Why Some Employees Adopt or Resist Reorganization of Work Practices in Health Care: Associations between Perceived Loss of Resources, Burnout, and Attitudes to Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2013:i:1:p:187-201:d:31539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/1/187/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/1/187/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helen M. Lloyd & Inger Ekman & Heather L. Rogers & Vítor Raposo & Paulo Melo & Valentina D. Marinkovic & Sandra C. Buttigieg & Einav Srulovici & Roman Andrzej Lewandowski & Nicky Britten, 2020. "Supporting Innovative Person-Centred Care in Financially Constrained Environments: The WE CARE Exploratory Health Laboratory Evaluation Strategy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2013:i:1:p:187-201:d:31539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.