IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v10y2013i12p6611-6629d30922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recruiting Hard-to-Reach Subjects for Exercise Interventions: A Multi-Centre and Multi-Stage Approach Targeting General Practitioners and Their Community-Dwelling and Mobility-Limited Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Brach
  • Anna Moschny

    (Department of Sports Medicine and Sports Nutrition, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany)

  • Bettina Bücker

    (Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, 58448 Witten, Germany
    Institute of General Practice, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany)

  • Renate Klaaßen-Mielke

    (Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiolgy, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany)

  • Matthias Trampisch

    (Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiolgy, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany)

  • Stefan Wilm

    (Institute of General Practice, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany)

  • Petra Platen

    (Department of Sports Medicine and Sports Nutrition, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany)

  • Timo Hinrichs

    (Department of Sports Medicine and Sports Nutrition, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany
    Impairment Control, Capacity Building & Health Maintenance Unit, Swiss Paraplegic Research, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland)

Abstract

The general practitioner (GP)’s practice appears to be an ideal venue for recruiting community-dwelling older adults with limited mobility. This study (Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN17727272) aimed at evaluating the recruiting process used for a multi-centre exercise intervention (HOMEfit). Each of six steps resulted in an absolute number of patients (N1–N6). Sex and age (for N4–N6) and reasons for dropping out were assessed. Patient database screening (N1–N3) at 15 GP practices yielded N1 = 5,990 patients aged 70 and above who had visited their GP within the past 6 months, N2 = 5,467 after exclusion of institutionalised patients, N3 = 1,545 patients eligible. Using a pre-defined limitation algorithm in order to conserve the practices’ resources resulted in N4 = 1,214 patients (80.3 ± 5.6 years, 68% female), who were then officially invited to the final assessment of eligibility at the GP’s practice. N5 = 434 patients (79.5 ± 5.4 years, 69% female) attended the practice screening (n = 13 of whom had not received an official invitation). Finally, N6 = 209 (79.8 ± 5.2 years, 74% female) were randomised after they were judged eligible and had given their written informed consent to participate in the randomised controlled trial (overall recruitment rate: 4.4%). The general strategy of utilising a GP’s practice to recruit the target group proved beneficial. The data and experiences presented here can help planners of future exercise-intervention studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Brach & Anna Moschny & Bettina Bücker & Renate Klaaßen-Mielke & Matthias Trampisch & Stefan Wilm & Petra Platen & Timo Hinrichs, 2013. "Recruiting Hard-to-Reach Subjects for Exercise Interventions: A Multi-Centre and Multi-Stage Approach Targeting General Practitioners and Their Community-Dwelling and Mobility-Limited Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:10:y:2013:i:12:p:6611-6629:d:30922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/10/12/6611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/10/12/6611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Branko F. Olij & Vicki Erasmus & Lotte M. Barmentloo & Alex Burdorf & Dini Smilde & Yvonne Schoon & Nathalie van der Velde & Suzanne Polinder, 2019. "Evaluation of Implementing a Home-Based Fall Prevention Program among Community-Dwelling Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:10:y:2013:i:12:p:6611-6629:d:30922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.