Author
Listed:
- Sujan Shrestha
(School of Civil, Environmental, and Infrastructure Engineering, Southern Illinois University, 1230 Lincoln Drive, Carbondale, IL 62901-6603, USA)
- Dewasis Dahal
(School of Civil, Environmental, and Infrastructure Engineering, Southern Illinois University, 1230 Lincoln Drive, Carbondale, IL 62901-6603, USA)
- Nishan Bhattarai
(Department of Geomatics Engineering, School of Engineering, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel 45210, Nepal)
- Sunil Regmi
(Department of Artificial Intelligence, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel 45210, Nepal)
- Roshan Sewa
(School of Civil, Environmental, and Infrastructure Engineering, Southern Illinois University, 1230 Lincoln Drive, Carbondale, IL 62901-6603, USA)
- Ajay Kalra
(School of Civil, Environmental, and Infrastructure Engineering, Southern Illinois University, 1230 Lincoln Drive, Carbondale, IL 62901-6603, USA)
Abstract
Flood impacts are intensifying due to the increasing frequency and severity of factors such as severe weather events, climate change, and unplanned urbanization. This study focuses on Briar Creek in Charlotte, North Carolina, an area historically affected by flooding. Three machine learning algorithms —bagging (random forest), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and logistic regression—were used to develop a flood susceptibility model that incorporates topographical, hydrological, and meteorological variables. Key predictors included slope, aspect, curvature, flow velocity, flow concentration, discharge, and 8 years of rainfall data. A flood inventory of 750 data points was compiled from historic flood records. The dataset was divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) subsets, and model performance was evaluated using accuracy metrics, confusion matrices, and classification reports. The results indicate that logistic regression outperformed both XGBoost and bagging in terms of predictive accuracy. According to the logistic regression model, the study area was classified into five flood risk zones: 5.55% as very high risk, 8.66% as high risk, 12.04% as moderate risk, 21.56% as low risk, and 52.20% as very low risk. The resulting flood susceptibility map constitutes a valuable tool for emergency preparedness and infrastructure planning in high-risk zones.
Suggested Citation
Sujan Shrestha & Dewasis Dahal & Nishan Bhattarai & Sunil Regmi & Roshan Sewa & Ajay Kalra, 2025.
"Machine Learning-Based Flood Risk Assessment in Urban Watershed: Mapping Flood Susceptibility in Charlotte, North Carolina,"
Geographies, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-17, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jgeogr:v:5:y:2025:i:3:p:43-:d:1726528
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jgeogr:v:5:y:2025:i:3:p:43-:d:1726528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.