IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jgeogr/v5y2025i1p15-d1616857.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trihalomethane Formation from Soil-Derived Dissolved Organic Matter During Chlorination and Chloramination: A Case Study in Cedar Lake, Illinois

Author

Listed:
  • Amin Asadollahi

    (School of Civil, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA)

  • Asyeh Sohrabifar

    (School of Civil, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA)

  • Habibollah Fakhraei

    (School of Civil, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA)

Abstract

Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is a critical parameter in water quality management due to its interaction with disinfectants, leading to the formation of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) during water treatment. Forest ecosystems are key contributors of DOC to surface waters, stemming from soil leachate. This study is the first to use DOC solutions directly extracted from soil to examine the formation of trihalomethanes (THMs) during chlorination and chloramination under varying environmental conditions. For this purpose, soil samples from a densely forested upland Cedar Lake watershed in Illinois were processed to extract DOC, which was then subjected to controlled disinfection experiments under varying pH, temperature, disinfectant dose, and reaction time. The results demonstrate that chlorination produces significantly higher levels of THMs compared to chloramination, with THM concentrations ranging from 31.996 μg/L to 62.563 μg/L for chlorination and 0.508 μg/L to 0.865 μg/L for chloramination. The yields of DBPs determined by chloramination increased approximately 4, 5, and 10 times with a higher DOC concentration, disinfectant concentration, and reaction time, respectively. For chlorination, these increases were approximately 5, 8, and 3 times, respectively. The presence of bromide in the DOC solutions influenced the concentration of brominated THMs (Br-THMs). The results indicate that a high formation of THMs, during both disinfection processes, occurred in the pH range of 7–8 and temperature range of 20–25 degrees Celsius. Furthermore, all tested water quality indicators (DOC, total dissolved solids, turbidity, and UV254), except for pH and Specific Ultraviolet Absorbance (SUVA), exhibited a strong positive correlation with THM levels during chlorination. In contrast, these parameters displayed a moderate to weak correlation with THM levels in the chloramination process. These findings highlight the critical role of DOC characteristics and disinfection conditions in controlling THM formation, providing valuable insights for optimizing water treatment processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Amin Asadollahi & Asyeh Sohrabifar & Habibollah Fakhraei, 2025. "Trihalomethane Formation from Soil-Derived Dissolved Organic Matter During Chlorination and Chloramination: A Case Study in Cedar Lake, Illinois," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jgeogr:v:5:y:2025:i:1:p:15-:d:1616857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/5/1/15/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/5/1/15/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amin Asadollahi & Binod Ale Magar & Bishal Poudel & Asyeh Sohrabifar & Ajay Kalra, 2024. "Application of Machine Learning Models for Improving Discharge Prediction in Ungauged Watershed: A Case Study in East DuPage, Illinois," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bishal Poudel & Dewasis Dahal & Mandip Banjara & Ajay Kalra, 2024. "Assessing Meteorological Drought Patterns and Forecasting Accuracy with SPI and SPEI Using Machine Learning Models," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jgeogr:v:5:y:2025:i:1:p:15-:d:1616857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.