Author
Listed:
- Vignaraj Ananth Vikraman
(Centre for Intelligent Cloud Computing, COE of Advanced Cloud, Faculty of Information Science and Technology (FIST), Multimedia University (MMU), Jalan Ayer Keroh Lama, Melaka 75450, Malaysia
AI and Data Engineering, HCLTech, Chennai 600119, India)
- Sumendra Yogarayan
(Centre for Intelligent Cloud Computing, COE of Advanced Cloud, Faculty of Information Science and Technology (FIST), Multimedia University (MMU), Jalan Ayer Keroh Lama, Melaka 75450, Malaysia)
- Kalaiarasi Sonai Muthu
(Centre for Intelligent Cloud Computing, COE of Advanced Cloud, Faculty of Information Science and Technology (FIST), Multimedia University (MMU), Jalan Ayer Keroh Lama, Melaka 75450, Malaysia)
- Manikandan Thirumalaisamy
(Department of Computer Science and Business Systems, Rajalakshmi Engineering College, Thandalam 602105, India)
Abstract
The increasing adoption of machine learning and deep learning techniques in intrusion detection systems (IDSs) has substantially increased the computational complexity of model development due to large-scale datasets, sophisticated model architectures, extensive hyperparameter optimization, and repeated experimentation. Despite these demands, existing IDS research primarily emphasizes detection performance while providing limited support for estimating the computational effort required during model development and evaluation. This study proposes the Adaptive Project Complexity Index (APCI), a complexity-aware framework for estimating Computational Software Effort (CSE), a computational resource-based effort metric derived from model training and execution characteristics to support planning and resource estimation in machine learning-based IDS development. To support this objective, a complexity- and effort-oriented benchmark comprising 1040 IDS project instances was constructed using diverse datasets, model architectures, feature configurations, and hyperparameter settings. Statistical analysis demonstrated a strong positive relationship between APCI and CSE, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.834. Building upon this benchmark, multiple machine learning models were evaluated to predict CSE from project characteristics available before implementation, with LightGBM achieving the best predictive performance (R 2 = 0.963). Furthermore, explainability analysis identified the dominant computational effort drivers and enabled the development of APCI-Adaptive, improving the APCI–CSE correlation from 0.834 to 0.904 (8.4%). By integrating dataset complexity, model complexity, and computational resource requirements within a unified framework, APCI enables computational software effort estimation prior to IDS implementation, supporting resource planning, experimental design, and complexity-aware project management for machine learning-based IDS development. Consequently, APCI provides a practical decision-support framework for resource planning, experimental design, and complexity-aware project management in modern machine learning-based cybersecurity applications.
Suggested Citation
Vignaraj Ananth Vikraman & Sumendra Yogarayan & Kalaiarasi Sonai Muthu & Manikandan Thirumalaisamy, 2026.
"APCI: A Complexity-Aware Framework for Computational Software Effort Estimation in Machine Learning-Based Intrusion Detection Systems,"
Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-47, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:424-:d:2012823
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:424-:d:2012823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.