IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v18y2026i8p409-d2005820.html

Multi-Agent Readiness Scoring Methodology in Bioinformatics Domain

Author

Listed:
  • Blagojche Gjorgjioski

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Rudjer Boshkovikj 16, P.O. Box 393, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia
    Adagon LLC, Ibe Palikukja 25/1-8, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia)

  • Djansel Bukovec

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Rudjer Boshkovikj 16, P.O. Box 393, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia)

  • Ivana Vichentijevikj

    (iReason LLC, 3rd Macedonian Brigade 37, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia)

  • Ivan Kitanovski

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Rudjer Boshkovikj 16, P.O. Box 393, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia)

  • Kostadin Mishev

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Rudjer Boshkovikj 16, P.O. Box 393, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia)

  • Monika Simjanoska Misheva

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Rudjer Boshkovikj 16, P.O. Box 393, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia)

Abstract

The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly advanced computational biology, yet their integration into autonomous, multi-agent systems (MASs) and clinical workflows remains challenging due to systemic architectural fragmentation. To quantify the operational readiness and regulatory compliance of bioinformatics LLMs, we developed the Multi-Agent Readiness Score (MARS), a standardized evaluation framework assessing models across four structural dimensions: Governance & Accessibility, Biological Competence, Technical Maturity, and Agentic Orchestration. The framework incorporates compliance criteria from the EU AI Act, HL7 FHIR, HL7 CDA, and MyHealth@EU standards. To empirically validate this domain-agnostic methodology, we applied it to a highly mature subset of the field: a diverse cohort of 43 prominent genomic LLMs. Our assessment revealed a severe, industry-wide readiness gap: the majority of models fell into “Not Suitable” or “Research Prototype” tiers, lacking essential technical interfaces, structured communication schemas, and provenance tracking. Furthermore, the data demonstrated a ’competence-readiness gap’, where models scale in biological predictive competence without corresponding improvements in engineering utility. The primary barrier to scalable bioinformatics AI is no longer biological competence, but operational and architectural incompatibility. By quantifying integration friction, MARS provides a crucial, reproducible metric to audit model maturity, guide system architecture, and ensure future models are structurally prepared for the rigorous regulatory demands of precision medicine workflows.

Suggested Citation

  • Blagojche Gjorgjioski & Djansel Bukovec & Ivana Vichentijevikj & Ivan Kitanovski & Kostadin Mishev & Monika Simjanoska Misheva, 2026. "Multi-Agent Readiness Scoring Methodology in Bioinformatics Domain," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:409-:d:2005820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/8/409/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/8/409/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:409-:d:2005820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.