IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v18y2026i8p391-d2000041.html

Agentic AI and Multi-Agent Collaboration in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Clinical Safety, and Future Directions

Author

Listed:
  • Subir Biswas

    (Biomedical Sensors & Systems Lab, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA)

  • Rajib Mondal

    (Biomedical Sensors & Systems Lab, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA
    Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA)

  • Manob Jyoti Saikia

    (Biomedical Sensors & Systems Lab, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA
    Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA)

Abstract

In the healthcare and clinical domain, artificial intelligence (AI) is evolving from earlier models that primarily predicted outcomes or generated content toward agentic AI systems that demonstrate the capability to make decisions and complete tasks autonomously. Previous research on AI has contributed significantly to disease identification, deep learning applications, large language models (LLMs), and generative AI. These systems primarily function as assistive tools, as they generate text or predictions without directly interacting with clinical infrastructures. Therefore, recent research trends are increasingly oriented toward agentic AI systems that extend beyond traditional predictive and generative model performance. This manuscript provides a detailed review of the current state of agentic AI, starting with the evolution of AI and the concept of a medical agent. A medical agent refers to an intelligent AI system designed to assist in clinical or administrative tasks by analyzing data, supporting decision making, and interacting with healthcare environments. Its underlying agentic AI architecture integrates planning, memory, reasoning, and environmental interaction to enable autonomous tool use, multi-agent collaboration, and continuous perception decision action loops across diverse healthcare applications and clinical workflows. The review further examines safety mechanisms, including human-in-the-loop oversight, self-verification strategies, and regulatory alignment frameworks, which are designed to ensure reliability, accountability, compliance, and safe deployment in regulated healthcare environments. Our findings indicate that a large number of AI agents have been introduced in various manuscripts for healthcare applications; however, fully autonomous systems remain challenging to achieve, as AI still faces several limitations related to reliability, interpretability, data dependency, and integration within complex clinical workflows. In response to these challenges, this survey shifts the focus from task-specific model performance to system-level autonomy and workflow orchestration, providing a structured foundation for understanding the design, deployment, governance, and limitations of agentic AI systems in modern healthcare ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Subir Biswas & Rajib Mondal & Manob Jyoti Saikia, 2026. "Agentic AI and Multi-Agent Collaboration in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Clinical Safety, and Future Directions," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-35, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:391-:d:2000041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/8/391/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/8/391/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:391-:d:2000041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.