IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v18y2026i8p386-d1999016.html

Comparative Study of Ground-Slot Geometries for 5G Microstrip Antenna Performance Enhancement

Author

Listed:
  • Amjad Hindi

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Amman 11134, Jordan)

  • Farouq Al-Taweel

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Amman 11134, Jordan)

  • Issam Trrad

    (Communication and Computer Department, Jadara University, Irbid 21110, Jordan)

  • Majed Dwairi

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Amman 11134, Jordan)

  • Elvira Dwairi

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Amman 11134, Jordan)

  • Safaa Moqbel

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Amman 11134, Jordan)

Abstract

This research paper investigates the impact of inserting a ground slot on the frequency performance of a monopole-type microstrip patch antenna. To examine this, a reference antenna, which is a simple rectangular monopole with the dimensions 2.4 × 2.04 mm 2 , was mounted on a 12 × 12 mm 2 Rogers RT 5880 substrate with a thickness of 0.254 mm and a dielectric constant of εᵣ = 2.2. It was also fed by a 50 Ω microstrip line. This work compares the effects of four different geometries of rectangular ground slots: rectangular, triangular, half-ring, and half-circle, on the performance of the microstrip patch antenna. The no-slot baseline antenna showed a resonance of 12.55 GHz and a reflection coefficient of −15.9 dB. Adding a ground slot allowed the advent of single or dual-resonant frequencies, which significantly enhanced the appropriateness of the antenna in 5G usage. Notably, the rectangular slot with b 1 = 3 mm achieved a resonance of 22.5 GHz, with a reflection coefficient of −33.7 dB, while b 1 = 1 mm enabled dual-band operation at 11.77 GHz and 38.3 GHz. Triangular slots provided strong single-frequency operation between 26 GHz and 31 GHz, and the half-circle slot with r 3 = 1 mm resonated at 12 GHz with a reflection coefficient of −39.5 dB. Although the half-ring slot had a comparatively lower reflection coefficient, it still showed dual-band potential at 11.1 GHz and 34.14 GHz. The simulation results were validated using HFSS, demonstrating good alignment. The gain of the selected antennas was also investigated, where the highest gain of 4.2 dBi was achieved by the half-ring slot design, and the lowest gain of 3.09 dBi was obtained with the half-circle slot. These findings confirm that ground-slot integration is an effective technique for frequency tuning and performance enhancement in 5G antenna design.

Suggested Citation

  • Amjad Hindi & Farouq Al-Taweel & Issam Trrad & Majed Dwairi & Elvira Dwairi & Safaa Moqbel, 2026. "Comparative Study of Ground-Slot Geometries for 5G Microstrip Antenna Performance Enhancement," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:386-:d:1999016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/8/386/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/8/386/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:386-:d:1999016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.