IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v18y2026i7p371-d1993265.html

Empirical Evaluation of a DevSecOps Proxy Pipeline for Multi-Tier Web Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Abderrahim Rida

    (Engineering Sciences Laboratory, National School of Applied Sciences, Ibn Tofail University, University Campus, Kenitra P.O. Box 242, Morocco)

  • Abdelaziz Bakhil

    (Engineering Sciences Laboratory, National School of Applied Sciences, Ibn Tofail University, University Campus, Kenitra P.O. Box 242, Morocco)

  • Ayoub Ait Lahcen

    (Engineering Sciences Laboratory, National School of Applied Sciences, Ibn Tofail University, University Campus, Kenitra P.O. Box 242, Morocco)

Abstract

The use of DevSecOps seeks to ensure that the functionality of securing software is incorporated throughout the software development life cycle, but the difference between the theoretical model and the empirically proven version, specifically for multi-tier web applications, remains wide. This research proposes the evaluation of a “proxy” DevSecOps pipeline, defined as an automated intermediary architecture that decouples intensive security scanning from the primary build flow to prevent bottlenecks. Designed specifically for multi-tier PHP-based web applications, the model leverages infrastructure as code (Terraform) and Static Application Security Testing (SAST) to ensure that security validation remains continuous without impeding the integration speed. This research utilized the Terraform model on the Amazon Web Services cloud platform, with three EC2 instances and Jenkins integration, and the use of many tools for the testing process, divided into the following experiments for DevSecOps functionality measurement: the first for the baseline efficiency process, the dynamic scaling process, the validation test for the fail-safe mechanism, and the accuracy process for the vulnerabilities’ detection. This research indicates that the process exhibited stability and consistency for the average execution times, which took 122.08 ± 1.69 s, and low values for the 5.04% additional cost for concurrent executions. The 100% activation process for the fail-safe mechanism for the injection of vulnerabilities indicates that the process took 41.82% of the total pipeline execution time, demonstrating that security validation is the most time-intensive part of the automated proxy workflow, and the low costs of 0.0047 dollars for the entire process, specifically for the infrastructure aspect. The false positives for the process were measured as 10–15%, and the low costs for the entire process, which took 0.56–0.58 s for the total process.

Suggested Citation

  • Abderrahim Rida & Abdelaziz Bakhil & Ayoub Ait Lahcen, 2026. "Empirical Evaluation of a DevSecOps Proxy Pipeline for Multi-Tier Web Applications," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:371-:d:1993265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/7/371/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/7/371/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:371-:d:1993265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.