IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v18y2026i7p355-d1986969.html

Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks with Edge-Heterogeneous Confidence Bounds: Clustering, Polarization, and Implications for Online Platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Zumei Huang

    (School of Finance, Henan Finance University, Zhengzhou 451464, China)

  • Zhuangzhuang Ma

    (School of Artificial Intelligence, Henan University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Lei Shi

    (School of Artificial Intelligence, Henan University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Lulu Chen

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

Abstract

Opinion polarization, echo chambers, and the rapid formation of opinion clusters have become defining features of debates on contemporary online social platforms. To explain these phenomena from a control-theoretic perspective, this paper investigates opinion dynamics in social networks with edge-heterogeneous confidence bounds, focusing on clustering and polarization behaviors driven by pair-dependent trust and asymmetric influence. Two discrete-time models are proposed, including an unsigned bounded-confidence model and a more general signed model that incorporates both supportive and oppositional interactions. The interaction structures are described by time-varying unsigned and signed digraphs, respectively, in which heterogeneous interpersonal influence is characterized by edge-dependent confidence bounds that naturally encode platform-mediated trust. For the proposed models, rigorous sufficient conditions are established for invariant cluster consensus and structurally balanced polarization. Numerical simulations, including a case study on the Slashdot Zoo signed social network with 50 controversial users, illustrate the theoretical results and demonstrate their relevance for understanding opinion evolution on internet-scale platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Zumei Huang & Zhuangzhuang Ma & Lei Shi & Lulu Chen, 2026. "Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks with Edge-Heterogeneous Confidence Bounds: Clustering, Polarization, and Implications for Online Platforms," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:355-:d:1986969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/7/355/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/7/355/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:355-:d:1986969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.