IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v18y2026i6p300-d1957922.html

Lightweight Intrusion Detection Systems for IoT–Edge Environments: A PRISMA-ScR Systematic Review of Deployability Evidence and a Unified Assessment Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Md Manirul Islam

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, American International University-Bangladesh, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh
    Faculty of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies, Samarkand State University Named After Sharof Rashidov, Samarkand 140104, Uzbekistan)

  • Umme Salsabil

    (School of Energy, British Columbia Institute of Technology, Burnaby, BC V5G 3H2, Canada)

  • Mekhriddin Nurmamatov

    (Faculty of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies, Samarkand State University Named After Sharof Rashidov, Samarkand 140104, Uzbekistan)

  • Sazzad Hossain

    (Faculty of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies, Samarkand State University Named After Sharof Rashidov, Samarkand 140104, Uzbekistan)

Abstract

Future internet services are expected to increasingly depend on IoT–edge deployments, in which intrusion detection must operate close to constrained, heterogeneous devices rather than only in cloud or data-center environments. Although the literature focuses on many “lightweight” intrusion detection systems (IDSs), the evidence supporting deployability is uneven and often limited to accuracy-oriented benchmark results. This PRISMA-ScR review, which was cross-checked against the PRISMA 2020 reporting items, synthesizes 78 peer-reviewed studies published between January 2017 and March 2026 and evaluates how they report model compactness, data and preprocessing burden, system placement, hardware measurements, operational robustness, and reproducibility. The reviewers independently screened 1162 deduplicated records and charted the included studies. This review found that architectural compactness is commonly reported, whereas target device latency, runtime memory, measured power or energy, zero-day evaluation, time-aware splitting, and device shift validation remain inconsistent. To make these gaps auditable, this study introduces a five-dimensional deployability framework using log-scale normalization, bounded benefit coding, completeness penalties, scorer agreement checks, and scenario-based sensitivity analysis. The results show that no IDS family dominates across all deployment scenarios: rankings change when hardware constraints or operational robustness receive priority. This review concludes with a benchmark blueprint, reporting protocol, completed PRISMA checklist, and research agenda for deployment-grade IoT–edge IDS studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Md Manirul Islam & Umme Salsabil & Mekhriddin Nurmamatov & Sazzad Hossain, 2026. "Lightweight Intrusion Detection Systems for IoT–Edge Environments: A PRISMA-ScR Systematic Review of Deployability Evidence and a Unified Assessment Framework," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:300-:d:1957922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/6/300/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/6/300/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:300-:d:1957922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.