IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v18y2026i4p208-d1920432.html

A Comparative Benchmark of Face Detection Models for Noisy and Dynamic Online Class Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Cesar Isaza

    (Cuerpo Académico de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación Aplicada, Universidad Politécnica de Querétaro, El Marqués, Querétaro 76240, Mexico
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Pamela Rocío Ibarra Tapia

    (Cuerpo Académico de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación Aplicada, Universidad Politécnica de Querétaro, El Marqués, Querétaro 76240, Mexico)

  • Cristian Felipe Ramirez-Gutierrez

    (Cuerpo Académico de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación Aplicada, Universidad Politécnica de Querétaro, El Marqués, Querétaro 76240, Mexico
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jonny Paul Zavala de Paz

    (Cuerpo Académico de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación Aplicada, Universidad Politécnica de Querétaro, El Marqués, Querétaro 76240, Mexico)

  • Jose Amilcar Rizzo Sierra

    (Cuerpo Académico de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación Aplicada, Universidad Politécnica de Querétaro, El Marqués, Querétaro 76240, Mexico)

  • Karina Anaya

    (Cuerpo Académico de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación Aplicada, Universidad Politécnica de Querétaro, El Marqués, Querétaro 76240, Mexico)

Abstract

Monitoring students’ on-screen availability is increasingly critical for analyzing participation patterns in synchronous online learning, especially under videoconferencing conditions characterized by compressed video streams, low-resolution face regions, fluctuating bandwidth, and dynamically reconfigured grid layouts. This study introduces a practical computer vision pipeline that integrates deep learning-based face detection, lightweight embedding-based identity matching, and frame-level temporal aggregation to estimate students’ visual presence (VP) during live online classes. A real-world dataset comprising 27 participants and 16,200 frames was collected under authentic conditions, including codec compression, variable image quality, and dynamic layout changes. Four widely used face detection models (Haar Cascade, DSFD, MTCNN, and YuNet) were benchmarked on noisy and low-quality images. Quantitative evaluation on a manually annotated subset of 270 frames demonstrates that MTCNN and YuNet yield lower average VP estimation errors (27.63% and 22.20%, respectively) compared to Haar Cascade (75.34%) and DSFD (47.14%), with YuNet also achieving the shortest average processing time of 0.069 s per frame. While the pipeline is intentionally streamlined to facilitate practical use by instructors, the study provides clearly defined steps and parameter settings, establishing a reproducible procedure for benchmarking face detection performance in synchronous online class environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Cesar Isaza & Pamela Rocío Ibarra Tapia & Cristian Felipe Ramirez-Gutierrez & Jonny Paul Zavala de Paz & Jose Amilcar Rizzo Sierra & Karina Anaya, 2026. "A Comparative Benchmark of Face Detection Models for Noisy and Dynamic Online Class Environments," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:208-:d:1920432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/4/208/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/4/208/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:208-:d:1920432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.