IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v18y2026i4p196-d1914057.html

Impact of Generative AI on Author’s Metrics and Copyright Ownership: Digital Labour, Ethical Attribution, and Traceability Frameworks for Future Internet Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Chukwuebuka Joseph Ejiyi

    (College of Nuclear Technology and Automation Engineering, Sichuan Engineering Technology Research Centre for Industrial Internet Intelligent Monitoring Application, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Sandra Chukwudumebi Obiora

    (Leeds Business School, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HB, UK)

  • Ijuolachi Obiora

    (Faculty of Health, Hugh Baird University Centre, Liverpool L20 3AL, UK)

  • Gladys Wauk

    (Institute of African Studies, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Maryjane Ejiako

    (College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Temitope Omotayo

    (School of Built Environment, Engineering and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HB, UK)

  • Olusola Bamisile

    (College of Nuclear Technology and Automation Engineering, Sichuan Engineering Technology Research Centre for Industrial Internet Intelligent Monitoring Application, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

Abstract

The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) into digital learning environments is a profound socio-technical transformation. While GAI promises enhanced accessibility and efficiency, it simultaneously obscures the human creativity and intellectual labour that underpins digital knowledge production. This opacity limits creators’ visibility into how their work is used, evaluated, and monetised. This review application work investigates how several leading large language models, including ChatGPT (GPT-4o), Gemini (1.5 Flash), and DeepSeek (V3), interact with a creative platform hosting over 300 original essays, poems, and artworks from various human creatives. Our review reveals that despite clear evidence of models engaging with original materials, standard platform analytics of the average creative record no attribution, referrals, or traceable interaction from their end, rendering creators’ labour invisible. This compels critical examination of knowledge provenance and power within AI-mediated education. To address this, we propose a socio-technical framework, Chujoyi-TraceNet, not as a technical fix, but a mechanism to re-centre ethics, justice, and recognition in digital governance. By integrating real-time tracking, blockchain-enabled licensing, and metadata watermarking, Chujoyi-TraceNet operationalises the principles of equitable attribution. This study argues for a re-imagining of digital ecosystems in education, one that links the technical act of attribution to broader debates on digital labour, platform ethics, and the pursuit of social justice, thereby contributing to more democratic and accountable learning media in the era of Industry 4.0 and 5.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Chukwuebuka Joseph Ejiyi & Sandra Chukwudumebi Obiora & Ijuolachi Obiora & Gladys Wauk & Maryjane Ejiako & Temitope Omotayo & Olusola Bamisile, 2026. "Impact of Generative AI on Author’s Metrics and Copyright Ownership: Digital Labour, Ethical Attribution, and Traceability Frameworks for Future Internet Systems," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-31, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:196-:d:1914057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/4/196/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/4/196/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:196-:d:1914057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.