Author
Listed:
- Rajesh Elangovan
(Alliance School of Advanced Computing, Alliance University, Anekal, Bengaluru 562106, Karnataka, India)
- Durga Devi Parthasarathy
(Department of Computer Science and Engineering (DS), Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600055, Tamil Nadu, India)
- M. Jawahar
(Department of Information Technology, Panimalar Engineering College, Chennai 600123, Tamil Nadu, India)
- Prabu Kaliyaperumal
(School of Computer Science and Engineering, IILM University, Greater Noida 201306, Uttar Pradesh, India)
- Balamurugan Balusamy
(School of Engineering and IT, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Dubai Campus, Dubai P.O. Box 345050, United Arab Emirates)
- Sumendra Yogarayan
(Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Multimedia University, Melaka 75450, Malaysia)
- Vivek Venkatesan
(Independent Researcher, The Vanguard Group, Exton, PA 19341, USA)
Abstract
The increasing heterogeneity of cloud, enterprise, and Internet of Things (IoT) environments raises concerns about the long-term reliability of machine-learning-based intrusion detection systems (IDSs). This study evaluates temporal robustness and cross-domain generalization using four publicly available datasets collected between 2017 and 2024. Five representative models—Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Multi-Layer Perceptron, Autoencoder, and a lightweight 1D-CNN—are assessed under in-dataset, forward temporal, enterprise-to-IoT transfer, and dataset-agnostic evaluation protocols without retraining. In the dataset evaluation, models achieve Macro-F1 scores between 0.84 and 0.96. However, forward temporal testing reveals consistent degradation, with performance reductions reaching ΔF1 ≈ 0.20–0.27 when models trained on 2017 enterprise traffic are applied to IoT datasets from 2023 to 2024. Under cross-domain transfer, Macro-F1 decreases to 0.69–0.78, and benign false-positive rates increase up to 0.30, indicating substantial sensitivity to traffic distribution shifts. Tree-based ensemble models show comparatively lower degradation (≈6–23%) and reduced performance variance across datasets. Semantic feature analysis further indicates that flow intensity and temporal activity features exhibit higher cross-dataset stability than protocol-dependent indicators. These findings demonstrate that IDS robustness in evolving Internet environments depends strongly on evaluation methodology and feature stability, highlighting the need for generalization-oriented assessment strategies.
Suggested Citation
Rajesh Elangovan & Durga Devi Parthasarathy & M. Jawahar & Prabu Kaliyaperumal & Balamurugan Balusamy & Sumendra Yogarayan & Vivek Venkatesan, 2026.
"Cross-Dataset Temporal and Semantic Generalization of Intrusion Detection Models for the Future Internet,"
Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-29, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:194-:d:1912974
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:194-:d:1912974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.