Author
Listed:
- Raymond Agyemang
(Cyber Security Research Group, School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK)
- Steven Furnell
(Cyber Security Research Group, School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK)
- Tim Muller
(Cyber Security Research Group, School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK)
Abstract
Organisations increasingly face complex cybersecurity threats shaped not only by internal capabilities but also by external regulatory, institutional, and environmental conditions. While existing cybersecurity standards and maturity models provide valuable guidance, they often offer limited support for assessing organisational readiness in a manner that is both context-sensitive and diagnostically meaningful. This paper presents a context-aware cybersecurity readiness assessment framework designed to support organisational evaluation of cybersecurity readiness while explicitly accounting for external environmental influences. The framework adopts a two-tier architecture. Tier 1 assesses organisational awareness of and engagement with the external cybersecurity environment, including national regulatory obligations, institutional support mechanisms, and international collaboration. Tier 2 evaluates internal organisational cybersecurity readiness across governance, operational controls, awareness and culture, and external collaboration practices. The two tiers are designed to operate independently, enabling complementary interpretation without assuming deterministic relationships between external context and internal capability. The framework is developed and evaluated using a Design Science Research approach and is operationalised through a structured assessment instrument and an interpretable scoring model. Empirical validation is conducted across multiple organisational contexts operating in developing and emerging environments, with qualitative case study evidence where available. The results demonstrate that the framework differentiates meaningfully across readiness domains, avoids artificial score inflation or compression, and supports interpretable diagnosis of alignment gaps between external expectations and internal practices. The study contributes a validated assessment artefact that extends cybersecurity awareness research into a broader organisational readiness perspective. From a practical standpoint, the framework provides organisations, policymakers, and researchers with a structured tool to support incremental improvement, informed decision-making, and reflective engagement with both internal cybersecurity practices and external environmental conditions.
Suggested Citation
Raymond Agyemang & Steven Furnell & Tim Muller, 2026.
"A Context-Aware Cybersecurity Readiness Assessment Framework for Organisations in Developing and Emerging Environments,"
Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-30, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:178-:d:1902347
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:178-:d:1902347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.