IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v18y2026i3p174-d1901158.html

Machine Unlearning: A Perspective, Taxonomy, and Benchmark Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Cristian Cosentino

    (Department of Informatics, Modeling, Electronics and Systems Engineering (DIMES), University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy
    Department of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FD, UK)

  • Simone Gatto

    (Department of Informatics, Modeling, Electronics and Systems Engineering (DIMES), University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy)

  • Pietro Liò

    (Department of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FD, UK)

  • Fabrizio Marozzo

    (Department of Informatics, Modeling, Electronics and Systems Engineering (DIMES), University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy)

Abstract

Machine Learning (ML) models trained on large-scale datasets learn useful predictive patterns, but they may also memorize undesired information, leading to risks such as information leakage, bias, copyright violations, and privacy attacks. As these models are increasingly deployed in real-world and regulated settings, the consequences of such memorization become practical and high-stakes, reinforced by data-protection frameworks that grant individuals a Right to be Forgotten (e.g., the GDPR). Simply removing a record from the training dataset does not guarantee the elimination of its influence from the model, while retrain-from-scratch procedures are often prohibitive for modern architectures, including Transformers and Large Language Models (LLMs). In this work, we provide a perspective on Machine Unlearning (MU) in supervised learning settings, with a particular focus on Natural Language Processing (NLP) scenarios, grounded in a PRISMA-driven systematic review. We propose a multi-level taxonomy that organizes MU techniques along practical and conceptual dimensions, including exactness (exact versus approximate), unlearning granularity, guarantees, and application constraints. To complement this perspective, we run an illustrative benchmark evaluation using a standardized unlearning protocol on DistilBERT trained on a public corpus of news headlines for topic classification, contrasting the retraining gold standard with representative design-for-unlearning and approximate post hoc techniques. For completeness, we also report two oracle-assisted upper-bound baselines (distillation and scrubbing) that rely on a clean retrained reference model, and we account for their incremental cost separately. Our analysis jointly considers model utility, probabilistic quality, forgetting and privacy indicators, as well as computational efficiency. The results highlight systematic trade-offs between accuracy, computational cost, and removal effectiveness, providing practical guidance for selecting machine unlearning techniques in realistic deployment scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristian Cosentino & Simone Gatto & Pietro Liò & Fabrizio Marozzo, 2026. "Machine Unlearning: A Perspective, Taxonomy, and Benchmark Evaluation," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-27, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:174-:d:1901158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/3/174/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/3/174/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:174-:d:1901158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.