Author
Listed:
- Sharon Roji Priya C.
(Department of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, CHRIST University Bangalore, Bangalore 560074, India)
- Deepalakshmi Perumalsamy
(Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Krishnankoil 626128, India)
- Rajermani Thinakaran
(Faculty of Data Science and Information Technology, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia)
Abstract
The rise of fake reviews has become a major problem for trust in e-commerce sites. As for traditional machine learning solutions, they fail to capture the nuanced language that separates real reviews from fake reviews. In this work, we introduce a new hybrid metaheuristic algorithm that optimizes the Fusion Mamba-Attention Network (FMA-Net) for fake review detection, called GEMS (Gas-Enhanced Marine Search). GEMS is a unique combination of the exploration capabilities of the Enhanced Marine Predators Algorithm and the exploitation process of Henry Gas Solubility Optimization, offering a dual-phase optimization design for high-dimensional, asymmetric, metaheuristic-configured GEMS-optimized FMA-Net. Geometric enhancement of GEMS optimization provides GEMS-optimized FMA-Net with an accuracy of 96.8%, F1-score of 95.4%, and AUC-ROC of 97.2%, marking 3–7% improvement over the current best models for fake review detection on the Yelp, Amazon, and Google Reviews datasets. We lower the average time of hyperparameter optimization using GEMS with FMA-Net to achieve 68% reduction in overall time spent in grid search and 42% lower for complexity in comparison to genetic algorithms. The contributions of this work are the first hybrid metaheuristic for transformers, a mathematically formulated GEMS algorithm, and an extensive empirical study for proving multi-dimensional metric plausibility.
Suggested Citation
Sharon Roji Priya C. & Deepalakshmi Perumalsamy & Rajermani Thinakaran, 2026.
"GEMS: Gas-Enhanced Marine Search for Optimizing Fusion Mamba-Attention Networks for Fake Review Classification,"
Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-42, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:132-:d:1876301
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:132-:d:1876301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.