IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v18y2026i3p116-d1870847.html

Conditional Counter-Inspection with Curriculum-Biased Experts for Lightweight 5G Intrusion Detection

Author

Listed:
  • Khaoula Tahori

    (Sciences and Techniques for the Engineer Laboratory (LASTI), National School of Applied Science, University Sultan Moulay Slimane, Khouribga 25000, Morocco)

  • Imade Fahd Eddine Fatani

    (Sciences and Techniques for the Engineer Laboratory (LASTI), National School of Applied Science, University Sultan Moulay Slimane, Khouribga 25000, Morocco)

  • Mohamed Moughit

    (Sciences and Techniques for the Engineer Laboratory (LASTI), National School of Applied Science, University Sultan Moulay Slimane, Khouribga 25000, Morocco
    Artificial Intelligence, Modeling & Computational Engineering Laboratory (AIMCE), ENSAM Casablanca, University Hassan II, Casablanca 20190, Morocco)

Abstract

In contemporary 5G network environments, intrusion detection systems must balance detection accuracy with operational efficiency, as improvements in one dimension are often achieved at the expense of the other. This study addresses this trade-off by proposing a lightweight two-stage intrusion detection architecture that augments a standard decision-tree classifier with a conditional counter-inspection mechanism. At inference time, a global decision tree produces an initial classification for each traffic record, which is selectively validated by a small set of class-biased expert trees trained under controlled minority exposure. Only experts associated with the opposite class of the initial prediction are activated, and decision revision is governed by a unanimous-dissent rule, ensuring conservative and deterministic correction while avoiding over-correction. Experiments conducted on the 5G-NIDD dataset in a binary benign/malicious setting show that the proposed architecture consistently improves upon the standalone decision tree, reducing false negatives from 51 to 27 (−47.1%) and false positives from 48 to 30 (−37.5%), and achieving an F1-score of 0.99981 on a held-out test set. Ablation and paired statistical tests confirm that these gains arise from selective validation and the unanimous-dissent mechanism rather than from uniform ensembling. The complete pipeline operates in the microsecond inference regime per record, evaluates fewer models on average than flat voting strategies, and preserves full interpretability through deterministic decision paths, making it suitable for practical and resource-constrained 5G intrusion detection deployments.

Suggested Citation

  • Khaoula Tahori & Imade Fahd Eddine Fatani & Mohamed Moughit, 2026. "Conditional Counter-Inspection with Curriculum-Biased Experts for Lightweight 5G Intrusion Detection," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-23, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:116-:d:1870847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/3/116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/3/116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:116-:d:1870847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.