IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v18y2026i1p57-d1844594.html

Performance Evaluation of MongoDB and RavenDB in IIoT-Inspired Data-Intensive Mobile and Web Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Mădălina Ciumac

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

  • Cornelia Aurora Győrödi

    (Department of Computers and Information Technology, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

  • Robert Ștefan Győrödi

    (Department of Computers and Information Technology, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

  • Felicia Mirabela Costea

    (Department of Computers and Information Technology, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

The exponential growth of data generated by modern digital applications, including systems inspired by Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) requirements, has accelerated the adoption of NoSQL databases due to their scalability, flexibility, and performance advantages over traditional relational systems. Among document-oriented solutions, MongoDB and RavenDB stand out due to their architectural features and their ability to manage dynamic, large-scale datasets. This paper presents a comparative analysis of MongoDB and RavenDB, focusing on the performance of fundamental CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) operations. To ensure a controlled performance evaluation, a mobile and web application for managing product orders was implemented as a case study inspired by IIoT data characteristics, such as high data volume and frequent transactional operations, with experiments conducted on datasets ranging from 1000 to 1,000,000 records. Beyond the core CRUD evaluation, the study also investigates advanced operational scenarios, including joint processing strategies (lookup versus document inclusion), bulk data ingestion techniques, aggregation performance, and full-text search capabilities. These complementary tests provide deeper insight into the systems’ architectural strengths and their behavior under more complex and data-intensive workloads. The experimental results highlight MongoDB’s consistent performance advantage in terms of response time, particularly with large data volumes, while RavenDB demonstrates competitive behavior and offers additional benefits such as built-in ACID compliance, automatic indexing, and optimized mechanisms for relational retrieval and bulk ingestion. The analysis does not propose a new benchmarking methodology but provides practical insights for selecting an appropriate document-oriented database for data intensive mobile and web application contexts, including IIoT-inspired data characteristics, based on a controlled single-node experimental setting, while acknowledging the limitations of a single-host experimental environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Mădălina Ciumac & Cornelia Aurora Győrödi & Robert Ștefan Győrödi & Felicia Mirabela Costea, 2026. "Performance Evaluation of MongoDB and RavenDB in IIoT-Inspired Data-Intensive Mobile and Web Applications," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:57-:d:1844594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/1/57/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/1/57/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:57-:d:1844594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.