IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v18y2026i1p48-d1839453.html

Evaluating Digital Marketing, Innovation, and Entrepreneurial Impact in AI-Built vs. Professionally Developed DeFi Websites

Author

Listed:
  • Nikolaos T. Giannakopoulos

    (BICTEVAC Laboratory—Business Information and Communication Technologies in Value Chains, Department of Agribusiness and Supply Chain Management, School of Applied Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Athens, 118 55 Athens, Greece)

  • Damianos P. Sakas

    (BICTEVAC Laboratory—Business Information and Communication Technologies in Value Chains, Department of Agribusiness and Supply Chain Management, School of Applied Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Athens, 118 55 Athens, Greece)

  • Nikos Kanellos

    (BICTEVAC Laboratory—Business Information and Communication Technologies in Value Chains, Department of Agribusiness and Supply Chain Management, School of Applied Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Athens, 118 55 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

This study evaluates whether an AI-built DeFi website case can match professionally developed DeFi platforms in digital marketing performance, innovation-related strategic behavior, and entrepreneurial impact. Using a multi-method design, we compare five established DeFi websites (Aave, Lido, Curve, MakerDAO, Uniswap) against one AI-built interface (Nexus Protocol). The analysis is designed as a five-platform benchmarking study of established professional DeFi websites, complemented by one AI-built case (Nexus Protocol) used as an illustrative comparison rather than a representative class of AI-built interface. The objectives are to (i) test differences in traffic composition and acquisition strategies, (ii) quantify how engagement signals predict authority and branded traffic, (iii) examine cognitive processing and trust-cue attention via eye tracking, and (iv) model emergent engagement and authority dynamics using agent-based simulation (ABM). Web analytics (March–October 2025) show significant variation in traffic composition across professional platforms (ANOVA F = 3.41, p = 0.0205), while regression models indicate that time on site and pages per visit positively predict Authority Score (R 2 = 0.61) and Branded Traffic (R 2 = 0.55), with bounce rate exerting an adverse effect. PCA and k-means clustering identify three strategic archetypes (innovation-driven, balanced-growth, efficiency-focused). Eye-tracking results show that professional interfaces generate tighter fixation clusters and shorter scan paths, indicating higher cognitive efficiency. In contrast, fixation on key UI elements and trust cues is comparable across interface types. ABM outputs further suggest that reduced engagement depth in the AI-built interface yields weaker long-run branded-traffic and authority trajectories. Overall, the study provides an integrated evaluation framework and evidence-based implications for AI-driven interface design in high-trust fintech environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikolaos T. Giannakopoulos & Damianos P. Sakas & Nikos Kanellos, 2026. "Evaluating Digital Marketing, Innovation, and Entrepreneurial Impact in AI-Built vs. Professionally Developed DeFi Websites," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-35, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:48-:d:1839453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/1/48/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/18/1/48/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:48-:d:1839453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.