IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v17y2025i8p335-d1710999.html

Privacy-Preserving Federated Unlearning with Ontology-Guided Relevance Modeling for Secure Distributed Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Naglaa E. Ghannam

    (Department of Computer Engineering and Information, College of Engineering in Wadi Alddawasir, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Wadi Alddawasir 11991, Saudi Arabia
    Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University (Girls’ Branch), Cairo 11754, Egypt)

  • Esraa A. Mahareek

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University (Girls’ Branch), Cairo 11754, Egypt)

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) is a privacy-focused technique for training models; however, most existing unlearning techniques in FL fall significantly short of the efficiency and situational awareness required by the GDPR. The paper introduces two new unlearning methods: EG-FedUnlearn, a gradient-based technique that eliminates the effect of specific target clients without retraining, and OFU-Ontology, an ontology-based approach that ranks data importance to facilitate forgetting contextually. EG-FedUnlearn directly eliminates the contributions of specific target data by reversing the gradient, whereas OFU-Ontology utilizes semantic relevance to prioritize forgetting data of the least importance, thereby minimizing the unlearning-induced degradation of models. The results of experiments on seven benchmark datasets demonstrate the good performance of both algorithms. OFU-Ontology yields 98% accuracy of unlearning while maintaining high model utility with very limited accuracy loss under class-based deletion on MNIST (e.g., 95%), surpassing FedEraser and VeriFi on the multiple metrics of residual influence, communication overhead, and computational cost. These results indicate that the cooperation of efficient unlearning algorithms with semantic reasoning, minimized unlearning costs, and operational performance in a distributed environment. This paper becomes the first to incorporate ontological knowledge into federated unlearning, thereby opening new avenues for scalable and intelligent private machine learning systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Naglaa E. Ghannam & Esraa A. Mahareek, 2025. "Privacy-Preserving Federated Unlearning with Ontology-Guided Relevance Modeling for Secure Distributed Systems," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-32, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:335-:d:1710999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/8/335/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/8/335/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nafei Zhu & Baocun Chen & Siyu Wang & Da Teng & Jingsha He, 2022. "Ontology-Based Approach for the Measurement of Privacy Disclosure," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1689-1707, October.
    2. Nicola Guarino & Daniel Oberle & Steffen Staab, 2009. "What Is an Ontology?," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Steffen Staab & Rudi Studer (ed.), Handbook on Ontologies, pages 1-17, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria V. Sigova & Igor K. Klyuchnikov & Oleg I. Klyuchnikov, 2024. "Sustainability and Security of Green Finance from the Multi-agent Games Perspective," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 1, pages 78-95, February.
    2. Hai Zhu & Xingsi Xue & Hongfeng Wang, 2022. "Matching Ontologies through Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm with Relevance Matrix," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Kęstas Kirtiklis & Rimvydas Laužikas & Ingrida Kelpšienė & Costis Dallas, 2023. "An Ontology of Semiotic Activity and Epistemic Figuration of Heritage, Memory and Identity Practices on Social Network Sites," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    4. Christophe Feltus & Damien Nicolas & Djamel Khadraoui, 2023. "Towards a Multidimensional Ontology Model for DIH-Based Organisations," International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science (IJKSS), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Xingsi Xue & Qi Wu & Miao Ye & Jianhui Lv, 2022. "Efficient Ontology Meta-Matching Based on Interpolation Model Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Bagstad, Kenneth J. & Balbi, Stefano & Adamo, Greta & Athanasiadis, Ioannis N. & Affinito, Flavio & Willcock, Simon & Magrach, Ainhoa & Hayashi, Kiichiro & Harmáčková, Zuzana V. & Niamir, Aidin & Smet, 2025. "Interoperability for ecosystem service assessments: Why, how, who, and for whom?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    7. Parastoo Delgoshaei & Mohammad Heidarinejad & Mark A. Austin, 2022. "A Semantic Approach for Building System Operations: Knowledge Representation and Reasoning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Fujita, Takaaki, 2024. "Reconsideration of Neutrosophic Social Science and Neutrosophic Phenomenology with Non-classical logic," SocArXiv 2e7sw, Center for Open Science.
    9. Xixi Zhu & Bin Liu & Cheng Zhu & Zhaoyun Ding & Li Yao, 2023. "Approximate Reasoning for Large-Scale ABox in OWL DL Based on Neural-Symbolic Learning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, January.
    10. R. B. K. Brown & G. Beydoun & G. Low & W. Tibben & R. Zamani & F. García-Sánchez & R. Martinez-Bejar, 2016. "Computationally efficient ontology selection in software requirement planning," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 349-358, April.
    11. Salvatore F. Pileggi & Marius Indorf & Ayman Nagi & Wolfgang Kersten, 2020. "CoRiMaS—An Ontological Approach to Cooperative Risk Management in Seaports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Nguyen Hoang Thuan & Pedro Antunes & David Johnstone, 2018. "A Decision Tool for Business Process Crowdsourcing: Ontology, Design, and Evaluation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 285-312, April.
    13. Jan Schweikert & Karl-Uwe Stucky & Wolfgang Süß & Veit Hagenmeyer, 2023. "A Photovoltaic System Model Integrating FAIR Digital Objects and Ontologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Wang Changsong & Low Jinghong & Aleena Tan Poh Ling & Muhammad Afiq Bin Sukiman & Lucyann Kerry, 2024. "An Understanding of Malaysian Cinemagoers in the Post COVID-19 Era by Using a Computational Ontology," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, June.
    15. Greig Charnock & Hug March & Ramon Ribera-Fumaz, 2021. "From smart to rebel city? Worlding, provincialising and the Barcelona Model," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 581-600, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:335-:d:1710999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.