IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v17y2025i11p491-d1780401.html

Towards Fair Medical Risk Prediction Software

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfram Luther

    (Department of Computer Science and Applied Cognitive Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, 47057 Duisburg, Germany)

  • Ekaterina Auer

    (Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences Wismar, Philipp-Mueller-Straße 14, 23966 Wismar, Germany)

Abstract

This article examines the role of fairness in software across diverse application contexts, with a particular emphasis on healthcare, and introduces the concept of algorithmic (individual) meta-fairness. We argue that attaining a high degree of fairness—under any interpretation of its meaning—necessitates higher-level consideration. We analyze the factors that may guide the choice of a fairness definition or bias metric depending on the context, and we propose a framework that additionally highlights quality criteria such as accountability, accuracy, and explainability, as these play a crucial role from the perspective of individual fairness. A detailed analysis of requirements and applications in healthcare forms the basis for the development of this framework. The framework is illustrated through two examples: (i) a specific application to a predictive model for reliable lower bounds of BRCA1/2 mutation probabilities using Dempster–Shafer theory, and (ii) a more conceptual application to digital, feature-oriented healthcare twins, with the focus on bias in communication and collaboration. Throughout the article, we present a curated selection of the relevant literature at the intersection of ethics, medicine, and modern digital society.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfram Luther & Ekaterina Auer, 2025. "Towards Fair Medical Risk Prediction Software," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-38, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:491-:d:1780401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/11/491/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/11/491/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:491-:d:1780401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.