Author
Listed:
- João Marreiros
(Escola Superior de Ciências Empresariais, Polytechnic University of Setúbal, Campus do IPS, Estefanilha, 2910-761 Setúbal, Portugal)
- Ana de Jesus Mendes
(Escola Superior de Ciências Empresariais, Polytechnic University of Setúbal, Campus do IPS, Estefanilha, 2910-761 Setúbal, Portugal
UNIDEMI, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal)
- Marcela Castro
(Escola Superior de Ciências Empresariais, Polytechnic University of Setúbal, Campus do IPS, Estefanilha, 2910-761 Setúbal, Portugal
NECE—Research Centre for Business Sciences, Department of Management and Economics, Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, Universidade da Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilha, Portugal
CIEQV—Life Quality Research Center, Complexo Andaluz, Aptd 279, 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal)
- Maria da Graça Costa
(Escola Superior de Ciências Empresariais, Polytechnic University of Setúbal, Campus do IPS, Estefanilha, 2910-761 Setúbal, Portugal)
- Tiago Pinho
(Escola Superior de Ciências Empresariais, Polytechnic University of Setúbal, Campus do IPS, Estefanilha, 2910-761 Setúbal, Portugal
UNIDEMI, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal)
Abstract
Accurate Estimated Time of Arrival (ETA) forecasting is essential for improving operational planning and decision-making in modern ports. While machine learning has significantly enhanced ETA prediction using Automatic Identification System data, the impact of data preprocessing on forecasting performance remains underexplored. This study investigates how AIS data preprocessing and machine learning model selection jointly affect ETA forecasting for short-sea shipping, using the Port of Sines as an empirical case study. A reproducible forecasting workflow was developed, integrating dataset construction, voyage selection, feature engineering, predictive modelling and performance evaluation. Three supervised machine learning algorithms, K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest Regression, and Multilayer Perceptron, were trained and compared under identical experimental conditions. The results show that forecasting performance depends not only on model selection but also on the quality of the modelling dataset. In particular, Random Forest Regression achieved the strongest and most consistent performance. It was found to be invariant to feature scaling, whereas scaling had a small negative effect on K-Nearest Neighbors and increased training variance for the Multilayer Perceptron. Although all three models achieved accurate ETA predictions, they exhibited different strengths regarding predictive performance, computational efficiency, and operational applicability. The proposed workflow contributes to the development of transparent and reproducible ETA forecasting methodologies and provides practical guidance for implementing AIS-based decision-support systems in short-sea port operations.
Suggested Citation
João Marreiros & Ana de Jesus Mendes & Marcela Castro & Maria da Graça Costa & Tiago Pinho, 2026.
"A Reproducible Workflow for AIS-Based ETA Forecasting: Evaluating the Influence of Data Preprocessing and Machine Learning Model Selection,"
Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-30, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jforec:v:8:y:2026:i:4:p:70-:d:2013179
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:8:y:2026:i:4:p:70-:d:2013179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.