Author
Listed:
- Farzaneh Esmaeilian
(School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA)
- Xinxuan Zhang
(Macricostas School of Arts and Sciences, Western Connecticut State University, Danbury, CT 06810, USA)
- Fatemeh Azizpourshoubi
(School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA)
- Marina Astitha
(School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80305, USA)
- Emmanouil Anagnostou
(School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA)
Abstract
Reliable power systems are essential to modern life, as severe storms continue to disrupt grid stability and cause widespread outages. Predicting storm outages enables utilities and emergency managers to pre-stage resources and improve resilience. However, the several days of forecast lead time typically needed for preparedness significantly affect the accuracy of outage predictions. This study investigates the impact of forecast lead time on the error propagation of a Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM)-based outage prediction model (OPM) driven by Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model forecasts and analysis predictions. We evaluate three error-analysis scenarios: FFAP (forecast vs. analysis-based outage predictions), FFAO (forecast vs. actual outages), and LFAO (leave-one-storm-out forecast vs. actual outages). Model performance is compared using Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and Centered Root-Mean-Square Error (CRMSE) across short (12 h–1 d), medium (2–3 d), and long (4–5 d) forecast lead-time categories, with the long category representing the upper end of the medium-range forecast window relevant to operational preparedness. The results show that forecast lead time substantially affects outage prediction accuracy, but the magnitude depends on the evaluation setup. In the controlled FFAP scenario, CRMSE increased by approximately 110% as lead time increased, from 259 to 543 outages, isolating the effect of weather forecast degradation. In the more operational LFAO scenario, CRMSE was already high at short lead times, increasing from 847 to 920 outages, indicating that model generalization error dominates once storms are unseen. Across scenarios, LFAO errors were 51% higher than FFAO errors at short lead times, highlighting the importance of testing outage models under unseen-event conditions. These results quantify how forecast degradation and model generalization jointly shape the reliability of outage prediction and provide practical guidance for lead-time-aware storm preparedness.
Suggested Citation
Farzaneh Esmaeilian & Xinxuan Zhang & Fatemeh Azizpourshoubi & Marina Astitha & Emmanouil Anagnostou, 2026.
"Assessing the Propagation of Weather Forecast Errors into Power Outage Predictions,"
Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-19, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jforec:v:8:y:2026:i:4:p:62-:d:1998095
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:8:y:2026:i:4:p:62-:d:1998095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.