Author
Listed:
- Peio Garcia-Pinilla
(Institute of Smart Cities (ISC), Public University of Navarra (UPNA), Campus de Arrosadia, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
inBiot Monitoring, P.º Santxiki, 2 LB5, 31192 Aranguren, Spain)
- Aranzazu Jurio
(Institute of Smart Cities (ISC), Public University of Navarra (UPNA), Campus de Arrosadia, 31006 Pamplona, Spain)
- Maria Figols
(inBiot Monitoring, P.º Santxiki, 2 LB5, 31192 Aranguren, Spain)
- Daniel Paternain
(Institute of Smart Cities (ISC), Public University of Navarra (UPNA), Campus de Arrosadia, 31006 Pamplona, Spain)
Abstract
Indoor CO 2 forecasting supports proactive ventilation control that balances air quality with energy efficiency. While Machine Learning (ML) models have shown strong performance in controlled settings such as schools, their generalization across indoor spaces with diverse occupancy dynamics remains poorly characterized. We present a systematic benchmark of 11 forecasting models spanning simple baselines, statistical methods, classical ML, deep learning, ensembles, and foundation models using 18 weeks of IoT sensor data spanning six real-world use cases: conference rooms, dining halls, hospitals, food markets, offices and student residences. Performance depends strongly on the prediction horizon and on the regularity of occupancy-driven CO 2 patterns. Simple baselines tend to perform best at short horizons (10 min ahead), while ensembles and fine-tuned foundation models provide more robust accuracy at longer horizons (4 h ahead). Remarkably, zero-shot foundation models demonstrate the ability to outperform trained classical models in data-scarce scenarios, challenging the traditional paradigm of localized training. These findings indicate that optimal forecasting strategies are context-dependent and challenge the assumption of universal model superiority.
Suggested Citation
Peio Garcia-Pinilla & Aranzazu Jurio & Maria Figols & Daniel Paternain, 2026.
"The Impact of Occupancy Dynamics on Indoor CO 2 Forecasting: A Cross-Scenario Evaluation,"
Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-24, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jforec:v:8:y:2026:i:2:p:26-:d:1901856
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:8:y:2026:i:2:p:26-:d:1901856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.