IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jforec/v8y2026i1p8-d1845763.html

Beyond Accuracy: The Cognitive Economy of Trust and Absorption in the Adoption of AI-Generated Forecasts

Author

Listed:
  • Anne-Marie Sassenberg

    (School of Business, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD 4300, Australia)

  • Nirmal Acharya

    (Australian International Institute of Higher Education, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
    School of Business and Law, Central Queensland University, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia)

  • Padmaja Kar

    (Australian International Institute of Higher Education, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia)

  • Mohammad Sadegh Eshaghi

    (Australian International Institute of Higher Education, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia)

Abstract

AI Recommender Systems (RecSys) function as personalised forecasting engines, predicting user preferences to reduce information overload. However, the efficacy of these systems is often bottlenecked by the “Last Mile” of forecasting: the end-user’s willingness to adopt and rely on the prediction. While the existing literature often assumes that algorithmic accuracy (e.g., low RMSE) automatically drives utilisation, empirical evidence suggests that users frequently reject accurate forecasts due to a lack of trust or cognitive friction. This study challenges the utilitarian view that users adopt systems simply because they are useful, instead proposing that sustainable adoption requires a state of Cognitive Absorption—a psychological flow state enabled by the Cognitive Economy of trust. Grounded in the Motivation–Opportunity–Ability (MOA) framework, we developed the Trust–Absorption–Intention (TAI) model. We analysed data from 366 users of a major predictive platform using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). The Disjoint Two-Stage Approach was employed to model the reflective–formative Higher-Order Constructs. The results demonstrate that Cognitive Trust (specifically the relational dimensions of Benevolence and Integrity) operates via a dual pathway. It drives adoption directly, serving as a mechanism of Cognitive Economy where users suspend vigilance to rely on the AI as a heuristic, while simultaneously freeing mental resources to enter a state of Cognitive Absorption. Affective Trust further drives this immersion by fostering curiosity. Crucially, Cognitive Absorption partially mediates the relationship between Cognitive Trust and adoption intention, whereas it fully mediates the impact of Affective Trust. This indicates that while Cognitive Trust can drive reliance directly as a rational shortcut, Affective Trust translates to adoption only when it successfully triggers a flow state. This study bridges the gap between algorithmic forecasting and behavioural adoption. It introduces the Cognitive Economy perspective: Trust reduces the cognitive cost of verifying predictions, allowing users to outsource decision-making to the AI and enter a state of effortless immersion. For designers of AI forecasting agents, the findings suggest that maximising accuracy may be less effective than minimising cognitive friction for sustaining long-term adoption. To solve the cold start problem, platforms should be designed for flow by building emotional rapport and explainability, thereby converting sporadic users into continuous data contributors.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne-Marie Sassenberg & Nirmal Acharya & Padmaja Kar & Mohammad Sadegh Eshaghi, 2026. "Beyond Accuracy: The Cognitive Economy of Trust and Absorption in the Adoption of AI-Generated Forecasts," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:8:y:2026:i:1:p:8-:d:1845763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9394/8/1/8/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9394/8/1/8/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:8:y:2026:i:1:p:8-:d:1845763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.